ارائه مدلی جهت پیاده سازی فین تک های نوین در صنعت بانکداری(وام دهی همتا به همتا)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (آمیخته )

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری ، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحدتهران جنوب،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،رودهن، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحدتهران جنوب،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحدتهران جنوب،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،تهران، ایران.

5 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، واحدتهران جنوب،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،تهران، ایران.

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدلی جهت پیاده سازی فین تک‌های نوین در صنعت بانکداری (وام دهی همتا به همتا) می‌باشد. روش پژوهش با توجه به هدف آن، کاربردی و از حیث شیوه اجرا، آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) و از نظر ماهیت و روش، پیمایشی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش مدیران، سرپرستان و کارکنان حوزه مالی و فناوری بانک­ها، خبرگان و صاحبن­ظران حوزه فینتک در کشور بوده که طبق اصول و قواعد آماری جامعه نامحدود 384 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. گرد‌آوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی از مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه محقق ساخته صورت گرفت. در تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های بخش کیفی از کدگذاری و نرم افزار MAXQDA و در بخش کمی از نرم افزار SPSS و AMOS استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده‌های کیفی پژوهش به صورت زیر       دسته بندی شد: در همین راستا مقولات استخراجی به صورت زیر دسته بندی شد: شرایط علّی: یادگیری سازمانی، نگرش سیستمی وفناوری اطلاعات. شرایط محوری: سرمایه ارتباطی، سرمایه انسانی و سرمایه ساختاری. بستر حاکم: بانک‌های همکار، نظریه پردازان خارجی، دولت و شرایط محیطی. شرایط مداخله گر: موانع و چالشها شامل، عوامل سازمانی، شرایط جامعه، عوامل فردی و عدم آموزش و پژوهش. راهبردها: خط مشی گذاری، برنامه استراتژیک و رضایت و وفاداری کارکنان. پیامد: خط مشی گذاری دانش محور، مدیریت دانش، نوآوری، خلاقیت و ایده وسازمان دانش محور. نتایج بخش کمی نشان داد که شاخص‌های برازش مدل بیانگر تأیید مدل در سطح اطمینان ۹۹ درصد می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

A Model for Implementing New FinTechs in the Banking Industry (Peer-to-Peer Lending)

نویسندگان English

Hosein Mohammadi 1
Narges Mohammadalipour 2
Noroz Norollahzadeh 3
Ghanbar Abbaspour asfadan 4
Mahnaz Rabie 5
1 PhD student, Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Epistemology, Roudhan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudhan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Accounting Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Abstract
The aim of the current research is to present a model for the implementation of new fintechs in the banking industry (peer-to-peer lending). The research method is applicable in terms of purpose, mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of implementation, and survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of the research was the managers, supervisors and employees of the financial and technological fields of banks, experts and specialists in the fintech field in the country; and according to the principles and rules of the unlimited population, 384 people were selected as a sample. Data collection was done by semi-structured interviews in the qualitative part, and by the researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. Coding and MAXQDA software were used in qualitative part data analysis, and SPSS and AMOS software were used in quantitative part. The results of the qualitative data analysis of the research were categorized as follows: In this regard, the extracted categories were categorized as follows: Causal conditions: organizational learning, system attitude, and information technology. Key conditions: communication capital, human capital, and structural capital. Governing platform: partner banks, external theorists, government, and environmental conditions. Intervening conditions: obstacles and challenges including organizational factors, community conditions, individual factors, and lack of education and research. Strategies: policy making, strategic plan, and employee satisfaction and loyalty. Consequence: knowledge-based policy making, knowledge management, innovation, creativity and idea, and knowledge-based organization. The results of the quantitative part showed that the fit indices of the model indicate the confirmation of the model at the confidence level of 99%.
Extended Abstract                                          
Introduction
Among the advantages of strategic cooperation between the banking system and fintech is efficiency in terms of speed, cost, and reaching new customers. The issues and problems of traditional banks include complex structures, high level of formality, increase in operational cost, providing banking services with more cost and time, lack of innovation in service, and failure to meet customer expectations (Soltanee & Tahmasebi Aghbolaghi, 2020). All these factors have led to the decrease in the popularity of the banking system; But on the other side of the field, the increase of people who, for various reasons, cannot use traditional banking services or do not want to use them, has led to the development of fintechs. This trend has confirmed the decreasing popularity of banks, and according to statistics, the average use of fintech globally has reached 33% (Hill, 2018).
Peer-to-peer lending in modern banking is a co-product of important business, technological and social processes. One item that has helped to create peer-to-peer lending is the presence of a new generation of freedom advocates. "Technological changes, globalization, and other international processes have reduced the number, size and role of commercial intermediaries in many industrial sectors. These changes have also led to the emergence of peer-to-peer lending. Individuals can become members as lenders by registering on the peer-to-peer lenders website." (Sarhangi et al, 2016). Borrowers also enjoy the benefits of lower costs compared to bank or credit union loans. Fintechs can provide new products and services for peer-to-peer banking customer groups that do not have access to traditional financial services. These conditions are possible through the following ways: improving financial participation, providing simple products with low cost and helping people who do not have easy access to banking services, and improving the customer experience, increasing transparency and improving security, and accommodating retail customers and small and moderate companies to fraudity and cyber-attacks (Wonglimpiyarat, 2017). Due to the importance of this issue, this research seeks to present and propose a suitable model for the implementation of new fintechs in the banking and peer-to-peer lending industry. In this research, we are looking for an answer to this question: what is the implementation model of new fintechs in the banking industry (peer-to-peer lending)?
Theoretical Framework
fintech
The term fintech means financial technology. Fintech refers to companies and representatives of companies that have combined financial services with modern innovative technology. Usually, new participants in the market offer Internet products and application-based products (Anil & Alistair, 2019). Fintech or financial technology is a set of businesses that use software and hardware to provide innovative financial services. The National Center for Digital Research in Dublin, Ireland defines fintech as innovation in financial services (Owzaei & Sohrabi, 2017).
Sadraee et al, (2024) examines the presentation of the fintech market development model with an emphasis on existing challenges and strategies. The results of the research showed that the challenges of fintech market development include insufficient infrastructure, regulatory and legislative barriers, difficulty working with public/general customers, mistrust of technology and fintech, low income levels and product pricing challenges, and cultural barriers. Also, fintech market development strategies include community participation in the marketing process, use of social networks, smart and optimal advertising, useful and valuable content production, branding, adaptation of communication strategies to the nature of the fintech market, geographic and cultural segmentation of the market, as well as customer education.
Khaled Mohammad et al, (2023) investigated the determinants of fintech adoption: evidence from a representative sample of emerging economies across the country. They identified important characteristics that predict customer fintech adoption among individual respondents. They found that customers were less likely to adopt fintech services if they reported higher levels of concern about security, information privacy, limited government control, and higher levels of perceived service barriers. Evidence showed that these concern factors, for example, are the main determinants of fintech adoption, unlike demographic variables. Our findings have insights for fintech service providers and policy makers.
 
Research methodology
The research method is applicable in terms of purpose, mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of implementation, and survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of the research was the managers, supervisors and employees of the financial and technological fields of banks, experts and specialists in the fintech field in the country; and according to the principles and rules of the unlimited population, 384 people were selected as a sample. Data collection was done by semi-structured interviews in the qualitative part, and by the researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part.
 
Research findings
Coding and MAXQDA software were used in qualitative part data analysis, and SPSS and AMOS software were used in quantitative part. The results of the qualitative data analysis of the research were categorized as follows: In this regard, the extracted categories were categorized as follows: Causal conditions: organizational learning, system attitude, and information technology. Key conditions: communication capital, human capital, and structural capital. Governing platform: partner banks, external theorists, government, and environmental conditions. Intervening conditions: obstacles and challenges including organizational factors, community conditions, individual factors, and lack of education and research. Strategies: policy making, strategic plan, and employee satisfaction and loyalty. Consequence: knowledge-based policy making, knowledge management, innovation, creativity and idea, and knowledge-based organization. The results of the quantitative part showed that the fit indices of the model indicate the confirmation of the model at the confidence level of 99%.
Conclusion
The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a model for the implementation of new fintechs in the banking industry (peer-to-peer lending). The results of this research is aligned with the results of Sadraee et al, (2024), Khaled Mohammad et al, (2023), Khosravani & Bahman (2023), Khazaei et al, (2022), Barrio Oton (2021), Kou et al, (2021), Pazhoheshfar & Biabani (2021), Hammerschlag et al, (2020), Nurjanah et al, (2020), Martinčević et al, (2020), and Zhonging et al, (2019). Zhonging et al, (2019) in a research entitled factors affecting the acceptance of fintech services for bank users and presenting a technology acceptance model, while studying the effect of fintech acceptance on bank service users, presented an innovative technology acceptance model. Also, the results of this research show that the respondents pointed to the popularity and acceptability of the Internet and smart tools among users, perceived ease, usefulness, and government support for innovation as positive and facilitating factors; and the risk of privacy as effective barriers to the use of fintech services by banks.
According to the results of this research, the following suggestions are presented:
1-Banking industries should take serious action to improve the implementation of fintechs by strengthening the dimensions of organizational learning which include: individual learning, group level learning, and organizational level learning.
2-a different attitude than the normal one should be used in the organization in order for a better order to prevail and to increase the overall efficiency and performance of it. The attitude required for use in the organization is the system attitude that connects all the elements in the organization to each other and does not examine any element alone because the organization is a system consisting of different elements. Based on the results of this research, it can be said that having a systemic attitude is one of the important factors of using fintechs.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

fintech
new technologies
strategic plan
knowledge management
innovation
organizational factors
Alam, N., & Gupta, L., & Zameni, A. (2019). Fintech Regulation. In: Fintech and Islamic Finance, 137-158. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24666-2_8
Anil, S.K., & Alistair, M. (2019). FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps? CAMA Working Papers, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, the Australian National University., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333515 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333515
Anikina, I.D., & Gukova, V.A., & Golodova, A.A., & Chekalkina, A.A. (2016). Methodological Aspects of Prioritization of Financial Tools for Stimulation of Innovative Activities. DOI:10.35808/ersj/525
Anshari, M., & Almunawar, M. N., & Masri, M. (2020). An overview of financial technology in Indonesia. In M. Anshari, M. N. Almunawar, & M. Masri (Eds.), Financial technology and disruptive innovation in ASEAN (pp. 216-224). IGI Global https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9183-2.ch012
Asadollah, M., & Sanavifard, R., & Hamidizadeh, A. (2019). Introducing a New E-Banking Model Based on the Rise of FinTechs and Startups (A Case of a Private Bank In Iran). Journal of Technology Development Management, 7(2), 195-248. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2019.3508.2214. (in Persian)
Barrio Oton, P. (2021). Social Media Marketing in the Fintech ecosystem: The case of Moonfare. Hochschule Furtwangen. Pp: 94
Carsharing Platform BlaBlaCar", (2019). Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier.
Furlonger D., & Newton, A. (2018, October 29). Digitalization Will Make Most Heritage Financial Firms Irrelevant by 2030. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/doc/338356-digitalization-will-make-most-heritagefinancial- firms-irrelevant
Gomber, P., & Kauffman, R.J., & Parker, C., & Weber, B.W. (2018). On the Fintech revolution: interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220-265. DOI:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
Gregor, D., & Julia, K. (2016). Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending – Evidence from two leading European platforms", Elsevier, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.009
Haber, J., & Dyakonova, I., & Milchakova, A. (2018). Estimation of fintech market in Ukraine in terms of global development of financial and banking systems. Public and Municipal Finance, 7(2), 14- 23. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.07(2).2018.02
Haddad, C., & Hornuf, L. (2019). ‘The emergence of the global fintech market. Economic and tech- nological determinants’, Small Business Economics, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 955. DOI:10.1007/s11187-018-9991-x
Hammerschlag, Z., & Bick, G., & Luiz, J. M. (2020). The internationalization of African fintech firms: marketing strategies for successful intra-Africa expansion. International Marketing Review, 37(2), 299-317. DOI:10.1108/IMR-05-2019-0130
Hatami Shah Mir, H., & Dastgerdi, M., & Hatami Shah Mir, A., & Hadi, B. (2018). Peer-to-peer lending system based on blockchain, the first national conference of modern and intelligent data mining and image processing businesses, Kerman, https://civilica.com/doc/990593. (in Persian)
Hill, J. (2018). Fintech and the remaking of financial institutions. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2016-0-03863-9
Khaled Mahmud, & Alam Joarder, M.M., & Kazi M.S. (2023). Adoption Factors of FinTech: Evidence from an Emerging Economy Country-Wide Representative Sample.Int. J. Financial Stud. 2023, 11(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11010009
Khazaei, H., & Faezy Razi, F., & Vakil Alroaia, Y. (2022). Acceptance model of new financial and banking technologies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(50), 289-306. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.119512. (in Persian)
Khosravani, A., & Bahman, P. (2023). The effect of fintech development on income diversification and liquidity in Tehran Stock Exchange banks, the first national conference of emerging researches in accounting, finance, management and economics with the approach of innovation ecosystem development, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/1922835. (in Persian)
Madnachi Zaj, M., & Heydarzadeh Aghdam, N. (2019). Feasibility of financing through peer-to-peer lending from an executive, legal and economic point of view, the 16th International Management Conference, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/996869
Martinčević, I., & Črnjević, S., & Klopotan, I. (2020): Fintech Revolution in the Financial Industry, In: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, IRENET -Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb, pp. 563-571, https://proceedings.entrenova.org/entrenova/article/view/357.
Nurjanah, I. M., & Muhammad Fadli, I., & Doddy, M. (2020). The Effect of E-Marketing with the AISAS Model on Shariah Mutual Fund Investment Decisions at Bibit Mutual Fund Fintech. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 8(1), 28-43. DOI:10.46899/jeps.v8i1.174
Owzaei, A., & Sohrabi, Sh. (2017). The role of new financial technologies and its impact on banks. The article presented in the third international conference on management, accounting and knowledge-based economy with emphasis on resistance economy. https://civilica.com/doc/693995. (in Persian).
Pzhoheshfar, P., & Biabani, M. (2021). Analysis of effective ethical and social factors of digital marketing in the field of online service startups. Ethics in Science and Technology, 58(16), 163-168. URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-2255-fa.html. (In Persian).
Sadraee, S. M., & Haghshenaskashani, F., & Karimizand, M. (2024). Presenting the fintech market development model with an emphasis on existing challenges and strategies. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 4(1), -. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.419093.1211. (in Persian).
Sarhangi, R., & Safari Moghadam, A., & Abedzadeh, A., & Latifi, Z. (2015). The relationship between financial technology and banks, how and requirements, the sixth national conference on electronic banking and payment systems. https://civilica.com/doc/785643/. (In Persian).
Seyam, H., & Habbal, A. (2023). A Systematic Review of Blockchain-based Identity Management Solutions. International Conference on Recent Academic Studies, 1(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.59287/icras.712. (In Persian).
Soltanee, M., & Tahmasebi Aghbolaghi, D. (2020). Explaining the Role of Tejarat Bank's Strategic Alliance with FinTechs in Efficiency Mediated by Technological Developments and Digital Banking. Journal of Business Management, 12(3), 800-832. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2020.296288.3753. (In Persian).
Wonglimpiyarat, J. 2017. FinTech banking industry: a systemic approach. Foresight, Vol. 19, No. 6, 590-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-07-2017-0026
Xie, G. Y., & Xu, E. M. (2017). Borrowing interest rate, user scale and P2P lending transactions: Moderating effect of platform capital property. Research on Economics and Man- agement, 12, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.13502/jenki.issn 1000- 7636.2017.12.005.
Ye, R., &  Lin, Y.J. (2023). Relationship Between Interest Rate and Risk of P2P Lending in China Based on the Skew-Normal Panel Data Model. SAGE Open 13(4). DOI:10.1177/21582440231201378
Zhongqing, H., & Shuai, D., & Shizheng, L., & Luting, Ch. (2019). Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Symmetry 11(3):340. DOI:10.3390/sym11030340

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 17 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 اردیبهشت 1403