ارائه مدل مدیریت عملکرد مبتنی بر مدل های BSC و EFQM در شرکت های معدنی و صنعتی کل گهر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.

2 استادیار ،گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.

3 استادیار ،گروه مدیریت، واحدکرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.

4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.

چکیده
هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل مدیریت عملکرد مبتنی بر مدل‌های BSC و EFQM در شرکت‌های معدنی و صنعتی کل گهر می‎باشد. روش پژوهش با توجه به هدف آن، کاربردی –توسعه‌ای و روش تحقیق توصیفی - همبستگی از نوع مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری می‌باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 940 نفر از کارکنان شرکت معدنی و صنعتی گل گهر می‌باشد، که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران تعداد 270 نفر از آنان با روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. برای جمع­آوری داده­ها­ی پژوهش، از سه پرسشنامه BSC، EFQM و مدیریت عملکرد استفاده شد که روایی و پایایی آنها مناسب و قابل قبول بوده است. تجزیه و تحلیل داده با استفاده از نرم افزارهای آماری SPSS و AMOS صورت گرفت. نتایج حاصل از مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری نشان می‌دهد که الگوی مفهومی مدیریت عملکرد با استفاده از مدلهای BSC و EFQM در شرکت معدنی و صنعتی گل گهر از برازش قابل قبولی برخوردار است و مدل‌های کارت امتیازی متوازن و تعالی سازمانی در صورت یکپارچگی، با پوشش نقاط ضعف یکدیگر، می‌توانند چارچوب مناسبی برای مدیریت عملکرد در شرکت معدنی و صنعتی گل گهر فراهم آورند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Providing a performance management model based on BSC and EFQM models in mining and industrial companies throughout Gohar

نویسندگان English

seyed ali alavi nasab 1
Massoud Pour Kiani 2
sahin sharafi 3
zahra shokoh 4
1 Doctoral student of Management Department, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
چکیده English

Abstract
The aim of this study is to present a performance management model based on BSC and EFQM models in Golgohar Mining industrial companies. The research method is applicable-developmental, and the research method is descriptive-correlational, using structural equation modeling. The statistical population of the study includes 940 employees of Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company, of whom 270 were selected by simple random sampling using the Cochran formula. To collect research data, three questionnaires; BSC, EFQM, and performance management, were used, whose validity and reliability were appropriate and acceptable. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and AMOS statistical software. The results of structural equation modeling show that the conceptual model of performance management using the BSC and EFQM models in Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company has an acceptable fit, and the balanced scorecard and organizational excellence models, if integrated can provide a suitable framework for performance management in Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company by covering each other's weaknesses.
Introduction
Undoubtedly, what distinguishes our world today from the world of organizations a few decades ago is the unstable and complex environment, increasing competition, rapid change and developments, and the increasing development of communications (Siraj & Hágen, 2023); and, on the other hand, the remarkable and continuous developments in management knowledge that have made the existence of an effective performance management system inevitable for organizations (Ohlig et al, 2021); in such a way that the lack of evaluation in various dimensions of the organization (including the evaluation of the use of resources and facilities, employees, goals and strategies) is considered as one of the symptoms and diseases of the organization (Shen et al, 2021). Therefore, all organizations are somehow involved in the issue of organizational performance evaluation; but what they do not agree on are the frameworks, methods and processes (Ehmann et al, 2023).
Performance management is a system for measuring the performance of human resources based on defined and agreed indicators (De Rooij et al, 2019). The goal of such a system is an economic and exploratory assessment of the various activities of an organization (Cvetkoska et al, 2023). In an organization, each individual needs to be aware of their position and performance in order to achieve the set goals and progress in their work [including reducing costs and waste, increasing productivity and efficiency and profits, increasing the satisfaction of those who refer to the organization with the services provided, improving the organization's output results, etc.] (Leviäkangas, 2021). Such awareness allows individuals to be aware of the weaknesses and strengths of their performance and behaviors, and to take the necessary measures to make their efforts more effective (Nguyen & Dao, 2023). BSC establishes a connection between strategic goals and criteria, and is responsible for planning goal setting and strategic alignment (Sarraf & Nejad, 2020). EFQM, as a comprehensive model for measuring the performance of organizations through the design and implementation of an organizational performance assessment system, analyzes their level of intelligent mobility in the optimal design of the movement path, the optimal implementation of goals, the review of the results obtained, and the measurement of the effectiveness of the actions taken; and determines the level of success of organizations in achieving excellence (Romero del Castillo et al, 2021). EFQM is also a methodological framework for evaluating the performance of organizations in two areas: processes and the results of these processes. The achievements of the assessment in this model are the strengths of the organization and its areas for improvement, which suggest a list of prioritized programs to achieve improvements. Based on the lessons learned from Total Quality Management (TQM), paying attention to the eight fundamental values ​​and concepts is a prerequisite for the success and continuous improvement of organizations (Bourillon et al, 2020). Based on the above, the researcher tries to address the main question: What is the performance management model based on the BSC and EFQM models in mining and industrial companies?
Theoretical Framework
Performance Management
Performance management is a process for achieving the business and overall goals of the organization through greater employee participation in activities, and performance appraisal [in the realm of performance management] is defined as an effective means of monitoring and developing employees in work groups (Dolatiet al, 2020). Performance management is a systematic approach that leads to improved organizational performance through the processes of setting strategic goals, measuring, collecting and analyzing data, reviewing performance data reports, and applying its results (Bitkowska, 2018).
Shariati et al, (2024) investigated the identification of factors affecting employee performance management with a human resource development approach in research and technology organizations. According to the interviews conducted, 6 dimensions of the paradigm model, 23 components, and 105 indicators were extracted. Then, according to the paired comparison questionnaire to identify influential and influenced dimensions, it was determined that among the 23 components, the components of the workplace, laws and regulations, socio-cultural factors, human resource planning, role clarity, performance measurement, organizational climate, reward system, employee communication, training, performance evaluation, professional ethics, leadership style, and motivational factors are the most influential, respectively.
Nasiri et al, (2024) investigated the design of a general employee management model with an emphasis on performance management. The findings of the qualitative section showed that the major and core categories in the form of six dimensions of causal conditions, pivotal phenomenon, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies and consequences were upgraded to a higher abstract level, and finally the paradigmatic model of the research was presented. In the quantitative section, the general management model was also approved.
Research Methodology
Regarding its purpose, the research method is applicable-developmental, and descriptive-correlation research method, of structural equation modeling type. The statistical population of the research includes 940 employees of the Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company, of whom 270 were selected by the Cochran formula using simple random sampling. To collect research data, three questionnaires were used: BSC, EFQM and performance management, whose validity and reliability were appropriate and acceptable.
Research findings
Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and AMOS statistical software. The results of structural equation modeling show that the conceptual model of performance management using the BSC and EFQM models in Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company has an acceptable fit, and the balanced scorecard and organizational excellence models, if integrated, can provide a suitable framework for performance management in Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company, by covering each other's weaknesses.
Conclusion
The present study was conducted with the aim of presenting a performance management model based on the BSC and EFQM models in Golgohar mining and industrial companies. The results of this study are consistent with the results of Shariati et al, (2024), Nasiri et al, (2024), Mahdavian sadr et al, (2022), Ismail & Amin (2021), Karaevli (2021), Shirtaheri et al, (2020), Kim (2020), Baruch (2019), and Deft (2019). Kim (2020) concluded that the performance evaluation model, a combination of the balanced scorecard and organizational excellence models, is effective in managing the performance of the insurance industry. Baruch (2019) showed: Prioritizing the improvement projects proposed by the EFQM model, according to the strategic and long-term goals of the organization, seems necessary. Karaevli (2021) in a study showed: the balanced scorecard (BSC) and the European Quality Model (EFQM) are tools for evaluating the performance of the organization with the aim of continuous organizational improvement. Given the expansion of organizational performance management methods, it is necessary to pay sufficient attention to choosing a method that will result in the highest possible return on investment.
According to the results of the study, the following suggestions are made:
- It is recommended to the managers of Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company; Considering the relationship between strategic goals (BSC goals) and the criteria of the Excellence Model (EFQM) to determine the level of achievement of goals and also to increase the efficiency of these goals, use the EFQM criteria. For example: to achieve the goal of growth and learning, pay special attention to the criteria of leadership, strategy, employees and partners.
- It is recommended; special attention should be paid to the criteria of the excellence model because these factors can provide a reliable understanding of the assumptions, needs and expectations of customers, global markets for greater competitiveness, as well as continuous improvement of processes based on the precise identification of situations and demands through the analysis of customer data, operational data and external benchmarks, etc.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Performance management
performance evaluation
goal setting
human resources
policy and strategy
Abbasianfar, A.R., & Zabihzadeh, A., & Marzbon, O. (2023). Investigating the role of organizational managers on efficiency and financial performance. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. 7(90). 1358-1364. (In Persian).
Abbasi, D., Ashrafi, M., & Ghodsypour, S. H. (2020). A multi objective-BSC model for new product development project portfolio selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 162, 113757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113757. (In Persian).
Ahmadvanv, M.A., & Torbati, A., & Pourreza, N. (2012). Designing Conceptual Model of Performance Management and Strategy Planning Using BSC and EFQM (Case Study). Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 4(1), 55-86. (In Persian).
Alavi Nasab, S. A., & Sayadi, S., & Pourkiani, M., & Salajegheh, S.. (2022). A conceptual model of performance management using balanced scored card models and European foundation for quality management. Social Determinants of Health, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22037/sdh.v8i1.37799. (In Persian).
Audenaert, M., & Decramer, A., & George, B. (2021). How to foster employee quality of life: The role of employee performance management and authentic leadership. Evaluation and Program Planning, 85, 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101909
Balaji, M., & Dinesh, S. N., & Manoj Kumar, P., & Hari Ram, K. (2021). Balanced Scorecard approach in deducing supply chain performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 5217–5222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.541.
Baruch,F, (2019). Prioritize improvement projects in the EFQM model with a balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 3 No.41, pp. 42- 64.
Bitkowska, A. (2018). Business Process Management Centre of Excellence as a source of knowledge. Business, Management and Education, 16(1), 121–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2018.2190
Boachie, C., & Mensah, E. (2022). The effect of earnings management on firm performance: The moderating role of corporate governance quality. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102270
Bourillon, B., & Acou, A., & Trancart, T., & Belpaire, C., & Covaci, A., & Bustamante, P., & Faliex, E., & Amilhat, E., & Malarvannan, G., & Virag, L., & Aarestrup, K., & Bervoets, L., & Boisneau, C., & Boulenger, C., & Gargan, P., & Becerra-Jurado, G., & Lobón-Cerviá, J., & Maes, G. E., & Pedersen, M. I., Feunteun, É. (2020). Assessment of the quality of European silver eels and tentative approach to trace the origin of contaminants – A European overview. Science of The Total Environment, 743, 140675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140675
Charmaz, K., & Bryant, A. (2019). Current Developments in Grounded TheoryLondon: Sage
Cheng, M. M., & Humphreys, K. A., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2018). The interplay between strategic risk profiles and presentation format on managers’ strategic judgments using the balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.009
Cvetkoska, V., & Eftimov, L., & Kitanovikj, B. (2023). Enchanting performance measurement and management with data envelopment analysis: Insights from bibliometric data visualization and analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 9, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100367
de Rooij, M. M. G., & Mannak, R. S., & Janowicz-Panjaitan, M. (2019). Dataset on performance management systems’ design in project-based organizations. Data in Brief, 25, 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104185
Delise, L. A., & Lee, B., & Choi, Y. (2023). Understanding project management performance using a comparative overrun measure. International Journal of Project Management, 41(2), 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102450.
Deft, F, (2019). Conceptual model of performance management in mission-oriented organizations. Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 5 (1), pp. 77–101.
Demirbag, M., & Apaydin, M., & Sahadev, S. (2021). Micro-foundational dimensions of firm internationalisation as determinants of knowledge management strategy: A case for global strategic partnerships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120538
Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2019). An integrated stochastic fuzzy MCDM approach to the balanced scorecard-based service evaluation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 166, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.04.008
Dolati, M., & Hosseini, M., & Vazgazi Doost, H., & Adalatian Shahriari, J. (2020). Designing and explaining a business process management model with a performance improvement approach in service-oriented companies: a mixed research. Quarterly Journal of Business Management, Year 12, Issue 48, pp. 213-232.20.1001.1.22520104.1399.12.48.11.2. (In Persian).
Ehmann, S., & Kampkötter, P., & Maier, P., & Yang, P. (2023). Performance management and work engagement – New evidence using longitudinal data. Management Accounting Research, 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100867
Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2020). Balanced scorecard in the hospitality and tourism industry: Past, present and future. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102656.
Hu, Y., & Xiao, S., & Wen, J., & Li, J. (2019). An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to construct maintenance networks for agricultural machinery cluster in a balanced scorecard context. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 158, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.031.
Ismail, W. K. W., & Amin, S. M, (2021). A template for identifying key performance indicators using a balanced scorecard and system dynamics. Journal of Management Studies,45.2., pp.402-424.
Johnson J.F. & Diana M. (2019). Comparison of Organization Evaluation Methods: Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Excellence Model (EFQM). Human Resource Planning, 33(6), pp.91–132.
Kim, S. (2020). Optimizing the performance evaluation of the insurance industry using the combined method of organizational excellence model and balanced scorecard. Hum Resource Dev Q. Vol.13,No.1,pp.31-52.
Karaevli, A. (2021). Comparison of Organization Evaluation Methods: Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Excellence Model (EFQM). International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 736-747.
Leviäkangas, P. (2021). Addressing sustainability or following political climate Rhetoric? Anatomy of government Agency’s performance management. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.12.002
Lu, M.-T., & Hsu, C.-C., & Liou, J. J. H., & Lo, H.-W. (2018). A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.05.008
mahdavian sadr, M., & Daneshfard, K., & givarian, H. (2022). Presenting a Conceptual Model of Performance Management of Policy Studies Institutes (Case Study: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly). Iranian Pattern of Progress, 9(4), (In Persian).
 Montanarella, L., & Panagos, P. (2021). The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal. Land Use Policy, 100, 104950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950
Nguyen, D.-T., & Dao, T. K. (2023). The mediating role of innovation in the relationship between high-performance human resource management practices and firm performance. Heliyon, 9(12), e22720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22720
Nasiri, M., & Firozabadi, A., & Slajagheh, S., & Mohamad Bagheri, M. (2024). Designing a general employee management model with an emphasis on performance management. Management and Educational Perspective, 6(3), 356-378. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.477239.1416. (In Persian).
Ohlig, J., Hellebrandt, T., Poetters, P., Heine, I., Schmitt, R. H., & Leyendecker, B. (2021). Human-centered performance management in manual assembly. Procedia CIRP, 97, 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.261
Ouazzani-Chahidi, A., & Abdellatif, L., & Jimenez, J.-F., & Berrah, L. (2023). Maturity levels of management process for improving industrial performance. Scientific African, 21, e01852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01852
Papadopoulos, G. A., & Kechagias, E., & Legga, P., & Tatsiopoulos, I. (2018). Integrating business process management with public sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2018(JUL), 405– 414.
Partelli, S., & Sclafani, F., & Barbu, S. T., & Beishon, M., & Bonomo, P., & Braz, G., & de Braud, F., & Brunner, T., & Cavestro, G. M., & Crul, M., & Trill, M. D., & Ferollà, P., & Herrmann, K., & Karamitopoulou, E., & Neuzillet, C., & Orsi, F., & Seppänen, H., & Torchio, M., & Valenti, D., & Poortmans, P. (2021). European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 99, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102208
Quezada, L. E., & Reinao, E. A., & Palominos, P. I., & Oddershede, A. M. (2019). Measuring Performance Using SWOT Analysis and Balanced Scorecard. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 786–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.430
Romero del Castillo, R., & Sans, S., & Casañas, F., & Soler, S., & Prohens, J., & Diez, M. J., & Casals, J. (2021). Fine tuning European geographic quality labels, an opportunity for horticulture diversification: A tentative proposal for the Spanish case. Food Control, 129, 108196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108196
Shariati, R., & Afsharnejad, A., & Majidi, M. (2024). Identifying factors affecting employee performance management with a human resources development approach in research and technology organizations, https://civilica.com/doc/2100852. (In Persian).
 Sainaghi, R., Phillips, P., & d’Angella, F. (2019). The balanced scorecard of a new destination product: Implications for lodging and skiing firms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.05.011
Sarraf, F., & Nejad, S. H. (2020). Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: Case study in water and wastewater companies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101762
Seraphin, H., & Yallop, A. C., & Smith, S. M., & Modica, G. (2021). The implementation of the Principles for Responsible Management Education within tourism higher education institutions: A comparative analysis of European Union countries. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100518
Shirtaheri, A., & Piroz, P., & Farashad, M. (2020). Human resource empowerment strategies are an indicator in the effective implementation of performance management. Journal of Accounting and Management Vision, 3(32), 34-65. (In Persian).
Shen, Z.-G., & Chen, S., & Liu, X., & Chen, B. (2021). A review on thermal management performance enhancement of phase change materials for vehicle lithium-ion batteries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111301
Siraj, N., & Hágen, I. (2023). Performance management system and its role for employee performance: Evidence from Ethiopian SMEs. Heliyon, 9(11), e21819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21819
Talarmin, C., & Kerob, S., & Cartier, F., & Madelaine, I., & Mukenyi, S., & Schwartz, E., & Boissel, N., & Baruchel, A., & Thieblemont, C., & Parquet, N., & Brignier, A., & Lesprit, E., & Desproges, A., & Magdelonnette, L., & Larghero, J., & Mebarki, M. (2020). Quality risk management of the chimeric antigen receptor T cell pharmaceutical circuit in one of the first qualified European centers. Cytotherapy, 22(12), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.06.009
دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16
تابستان 1404
صفحه 144-164

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 آذر 1403