Identifying factors affecting delivery points, risk transfer and costs in international trade with an emphasis on Incoterms 2020

Document Type : Original Article (Mixed)

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to identify factors affecting the delivery points, risk transfer and costs in international commerce with emphasis on Incoterms 2020. The research method is applicable-operational in terms of its purpose, and mixed (qualitative) and exploratory research in terms of implementation. The statistical population in the qualitative sector consisted of 12 academic experts and experts in the field of international commerce, international transportation and Incoterms, selected by targeted sampling and snowball; and statistical population consists of 10 experts in the field of commerce. Data collection tools were semi-structural interview in the qualitative section, and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative section. The study was conducted in two stages, including the data-based method and the Delphi technique. Maxqda20 software was used to analyze the qualitative data, and SPSS software in the qualitative part. The results in the qualitative section showed that 7 effective factors, 13 components, 11 strategies, and 2 consequences were identified and extracted. In the quantitative section, 33 effective factors were identified in the four stages of the Delphi interview technique. These findings will be able to provide a tool for senior executives of international interactions in effective planning for the use of Incoterms Regulations to optimize delivery points, risk transfer and costs in international supply chain management, given the buyer and seller's relationships in transboundary transactions.
Extended Abstract                                          
Introduction
Supply Chain Management in production, inventory control, location, distribution, logistics management and transportation between supply chain factors is to achieve the best responsive, efficient and profitability of market success (Song et al, 2022). Companies are more at risk when more dependent on the other dealing party (Hallikas, 2004, Swink & Zsoidisin, 2006). With the increase in the volume and complexity of the business, especially globally, the likelihood of disputes or misunderstandings of the supply chain partners has also increased; therefore, a set of commercial terms, called Incoterms rules, is designed by the International Chamber of Commerce to standardize the performance of businesses when concluding a contract for the sale of goods (Davis & Vogt, 2021). Incoterms, which is being updated periodically, determines who is incurred in international trade, cost and risk. Choosing the delivery method caused by these bylaws is one of the most important issues that should be consciously considered for both the buyer and the seller (Erdogan & Kavas, 2020). The important thing is that these laws are not mandatory, they only play the role of supporting actors involved in international trade, but if the parties agree to use them, they become mandatory (Mirică & Tudor, 2022). Incoterms' terms support trade growth and facilitate their use of international and domestic trade (Davis & Vogt, 2021), to the extent that they are known as the columns of international trade (Coetzee, 2010). The responsibility and how to settle costs and risks in international trade is an essential aspect of international competitiveness (Baena-Rojas & Cano, 2022). Therefore, according to the above, the researcher seeks to answer the question: What are the factors affecting the delivery, risk transfer and costs in international commerce with emphasis on Incoters 2020?
Theoretical Framework
Supply Chain Management
Supply chain management is known as a network management of interconnected businesses that are involved in providing final product packaging and service to the customer; as a result, the supply chain management covers all the necessary displacements and warehousing of the raw materials between the process and the finished products from the basic point to the point of consumption (Ghadri et al, 2019)
Delivery of goods in international trade
Delivery is one of the most important and basic principles in any foreign sales agreement. For each party, the delivery has its own specific place. On the one hand, the seller calls for more freedom on the terms and conditions of delivery, and on the other hand the buyer calls for more confidence in delivery of the goods in terms of quantity and qualitatively and in accordance with the raised conditions; in this context, the documentation or other documents related to the products order are important. Some commentators have defined the delivery as any action that allows the buyer to dominate the goods' buyer (Abadi & Azadi, 2017).
 
Incoterms
Incoterms is part of a business contract between the seller and the buyer. Proper business terms improve logistical engineering, reduce risk, save the company's money; and successful transportation provides solid bases for transnational transactions (Jimnez, 2012).
KIM (2022) in a study entitled "Some Critical and Controversial problems about Incoterms 2020 for International Trade" argues that Incoterms has been revised for the eighth time since its initial release in 1936. Incoterms 2020 (eighth edition) was required on January 1, 2020. Like the 2010 Incoterms (Seventh Edition), Incoterms 2020 provides eleven law (seven laws for multiple transport and four laws for marine transport), but Incoterms 2020 added DPU law by deleting the DAT law. The 2020 Incoterms seems to be improved and better organized, but it also brings some important and controversial issues. This article discusses some of the most important and controversial issues about Incoterms 2020.
Karimi et al, (2022) investigated the impact of supply chain strategic management on performance and orientation of supply chain with the role of resilience mediation (case study of the Oil Industry Offshore Sector). The results showed: 1- Supply chain strategic management has a direct and significant impact on the supply chain orientation, 2- Supply chain strategic management has an indirect and significant impact on supply chain orientation (through agility and chain strength), 3- Supply chain strategic management has no direct and significant impact on the performance of the supply chain, 4- Supply chain strategic management has an indirect and significant impact on supply chain performance (through agility and chain strength), 5- Chain agility plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between strategic management of supply chain and chain performance and orientation. 6- The chain strength has a mediating significant role in the relationship between strategic management of the supply chain and chain performance and orientation.
Research methodology
The research method is applicable-operational in terms of its purpose, and mixed (qualitative) and exploratory research in terms of implementation. The statistical population in the qualitative sector consisted of 12 academic experts and experts in the field of international commerce, international transportation and Incoterms, selected by targeted sampling and snowball; and statistical population consists of 10 experts in the field of commerce. Data collection tools were semi-structural interview in the qualitative section, and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative section. The study was conducted in two stages, including the data-based method and the Delphi technique.
Research Findings
Maxqda20 software was used to analyze the qualitative data, and SPSS software in the qualitative part. The results in the qualitative section showed that 7 effective factors, 13 components, 11 strategies, and 2 consequences were identified and extracted. In the quantitative section, 33 effective factors were identified in the four stages of the Delphi interview technique. These findings will be able to provide a tool for senior executives of international interactions in effective planning for the use of Incoterms Regulations to optimize delivery points, risk transfer and costs in international supply chain management, given the buyer and seller's relationships in transboundary transactions.
Conclusion
The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting the delivery points, risk transfer, and costs in international commerce with emphasis on Incoterms 2020. The results of this study are consistent with the results of samiei et al, (2023), ahmadi et al, (2023), KIM (2022), Karimi et al, (2022), Durdağ & Delipinar (2021), Miltikbaevich & Kizi (2021), Stojanović & Ivetic (2020), Erdogan & Kavas (2020), Shafei et al, (2021), Islami Tabar et al, (2020), Ranjbarzadeh (2020), and Herghelegiu et al, (2019). KIM (2022) argue in a study entitled "Some Critical and Controversial issues abort Incoterms 2020 for International Trade", that Incoterms 2020 provides eleven laws (seven laws for multiple transport and four laws for maritime transport). Incoterms 2020 improved and better organized
It is recommended that companies with international transactions during international negotiations on the purchase or sale of goods and prior to the contract of sale, transportation, insurance and inspection, should consider effective factors and extracted indicators in this study to:
1- Reduce product transfer costs and reduce risk between buyer and seller.
2- Bring the country's economic growth and development by removing the ambiguities of transactions and increasing the quality of transactions.
3-Develop willingness to foreign direct investment by improving the international business environment.
 

Keywords

Subjects


Abrishmi, H., & Sobhani, H., & Majed, V., & Aghalovi Aghmioni, A. (2020). Investigating the resilience of the banking system by focusing on the behavior of consumers of facilities and banking health indicators. Bi-quarterly Journal of Consumer Behavior Studies, Volume: 7, Number: 2, https://civilica.com/doc/1190174 (in Persian)
Ahmadi, A., Fegh-hi Farahmand, N., & Iranzadeh, S. (2023). Designing the distribution channel selection system in the supply chain of the oil industry using the combination of adaptive neural-fuzzy network and meta-heuristic algorithms. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 3(3), 198-228. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.408002.1145. (In Persian. (
Abadi, M. H., & Azadi, A. (2017). Delivery of Goods on International Sales. J. Pol. & L., 10(4), 100. DOI:10.5539/jpl.v10n4p100
Ardianto, A. A. A., & Mudjahidin M. (2022). Development of conceptual model integrated estimation system for fish growth and feed requirement in aquaculture supply chain management. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 461-468. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.162
Baena-Rojas, J. J., & Cano, J. A. (2022). Technique for estimation of costs and prices in contracts for the international sale of goods based on incoterms®. Acta Logistica, 9(2), 171-181. DOI:10.22306/al.v9i2.291
Bavarsad, B. & Rahimi, F. & Salimi Fard, A. & Kalambar, M. (2017). Investigating the impact of social capital on the performance of Mehr Ekhetaz banks in Khuzestan province from the employees' point of view. Social Development Quarterly, Volume: 11, Number: 3, https://civilica.com/doc/1575765. (In Persian. (
Bergami, R., & Tichá, L. (2022). Managing Incoterms® 2020 export risks. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 23(2), 255-273.
Coetzee, J. (2010). INCOTERMS as a form of standardization in international sales law: an analysis of the interplay between mercantile custom and substantive sales law with specific reference to the passing of risk (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch). http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/5222
Davis, J., & Vogt, J. (2021). Hidden Supply Chain Risk and Incoterms®: Analysis and Mitigation Strategies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120619
Durdağ, C., & Delipinar, G. E. (2021). The past, today and future of incoterms in international delivery: A review on the innovations in logistics.  Journal of Economics Library, 7(4), 201-207. DOI:10.1453/jel.v7i4.2166
Erdogan, M., & Kavas, E. (2020). Incoterms and New Transport Types: The Importance of Drones. In Handbook of Research on the Applications of International Transportation and Logistics for World Trade (pp. 151-180). IGI Global.
Ghadri, H., & Taghdarian Ardakan, A., & Fatuhi Ardakani, H., & Karimi Zarchi, M. (2019). Presenting a structural model of sustainable supply chain management in companies with multiple businesses (case study: Shahid Ghandi Manufacturing Industries Company), the fourth international conference International Industrial Management, Yazd, https://civilica.com/doc/937896. (In Persian. (
Gölgeci, I., & Kuivalainen, O. (2020). Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing-supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 63-74. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006
Hallikas, J., & Karvonen, I., & Pulkkinen, U., & Virolainen, V. M., & Tuominen, M. (2004). Risk management processes in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics,90(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.007
Hedström, J., & Granberg, G. (2009). Incoterms klausulers användning i österbotniska företag.
Helo, P., & Hao, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence in operations management and supply chain management: An exploratory case study. Production Planning & Control, 33(16), 1573-1590‏. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1882690
Herghelegiu, C., & Monastyrenko, E. (2019). Risk-and Cost-Sharing in Firm-to-Firm Trade.
Huuhka, H. (2019). Effective use of Incoterms in the case company.
Islamic Tabar, Sh., & Ilam, E., & Kamijani, N. (2019). Comparative study of legal requirements and international standards governing the packaging of medicine and medical equipment. Scientific Quarterly of Packaging Sciences and Techniques, 11(41): 38-49. https://civilica.com/doc/1035839/. (In Persian)
Karimi, F., Haghighat Monfared, J., & Keramati, M. (2022). The effect of strategic supply chain management on the performance and orientation of the supply chain by analyzing the mediating role of resilience (A case study of the offshore sector of the oil industry). Journal of value creating in Business Management, 2(3), 61-81. doi: 10.22034/jbme.2023.367725.1040. (In Persian. (
Kim, S. M. (2022). Some Critical & Controversial Issues on Incoterms 2020 for International Trade. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(1). 44-48. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022006
Miltikbaevich, S. A., & Kizi, F. R. F. (2021). The Impact of Incoterms 2020 Rules on the Development of International Trade. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(11), 581-587. Retrieved from https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/article/view/555
Mirică, S.C., & Tudor, F. (2022). The Defining Role of Delivery Conditions in International Trade of Goods by Sea for the Detection of Irregularities and Non-Conformities. International Investment Law Journal, 2(1), 93-98.
Njuguna, C. (2022). Supplier-buyer relationship dynamics in supply chain management. P:2.
O’Meara, A. (2017). Making Money with Incoterms 2010: Strategic Use of Incoterms Rules in Purchases and Sales.
Ranjbarzadeh, J. (2020). Incoterms, in international trade law. Kanon Yar, 4(15), 51-72. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/525397/fa. (In Persian)
Samiei, H. A., Mehrabian, A., Ashrafi, M., & Khamaki, A. (2023). Financial benefits and costs,sustainable supply chain,conditions of uncertainty,manufacturing companies.. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 3(3), 41-64. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.402968.1120. (In Persian. (
Schaefer, T. J. (2017). Incoterms® use in buyer-seller relationships: a mixed methods study. School of the University of Missouri-St. Louis, (Doctoral’s thesis).
Shafi'i, B., & Mansouri, S., & Shams, A. (2021). A reflection on the responsibility of the shipper due to the delay in the loading and unloading operations of the ship: in the light of commercial terms and international conventions. International Legal Research, 14(54): 239-256.10.30495/jlap.2022.20473. (In Persian)
Song, M., & Ma, X., & Zhao, X., & Zhang, L. (2022). How to enhance supply chain resilience: a logistics approach The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1408-1436‏. DOI:10.1108/IJLM-04-2021-0211
Stojanović, D., & Ivetic, J. (2020). Possibilities of using Incoterms clauses in a country logistics performance assessment and benchmarking. Transport Policy. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.012
Swink, M., & Zsidisin, G. (2006). On the benefits and risks of focused commitment to suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 44(20), 4223-4240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600575761
Uhlenberg, A. (2017). Key Issues in Supply Chain Management and How to Overcome Them.
Vidrova, Z. (2020). Supply chain management in the aspect of globalization. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 74, p. 04031). EDP Sciences. DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20207404031
Wang, Y., & Jia, F., & Schoenherr, T., & Gong, Y. (2018). Supply chain-based business model innovation: the case of a cross-border E-commerce company. Sustainability, 10(12), 4362. DOI:10.3390/su10124362
Wieland, A. (2021). Dancing the supply chain: Toward transformative supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12248
Yaakub, S., & Szu, L. Y., & Arbak, S., & Ab Halim, N. (2018). INCOTERMS Selection Factors and Their Effect on Export Performance.
 
Volume 4, Issue 3 - Serial Number 13
Autumn 2024
Pages 105-140

  • Receive Date 16 February 2024
  • Revise Date 21 March 2024
  • Accept Date 16 April 2024