طراحی الگوی برندسازی مشترک در صنعت بانکداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (آمیخته )

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد شهرقدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی برندسازی مشترک با استفاده از روش مدلسازی ساختاری-تفسیری است. روش تحقیق این مطالعه از لحاظ ماهیت اکتشافی با رویکرد آمیخته است. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها و شناسایی عوامل از روش تحلیل محتوا و مرور متون مربوطه و همچنین مصاحبه با ده نفر از خبرگان منتخب به روش غیرتصادفی و تکنیک گلوله برفی تاحصول به اشباع نظری استفاده گردید.برای دستیابی به یافته های تحقیق، پرسشنامه ماتریسی ساخت‌یافته برای تعیین ارتباطات بینابینی شاخص‌ها تدوین گردید. داده‌های حاصل از پرسشنامه با استفاده از مدلسازی ساختاری-تفسیری، تحلیل و در سه سطح در یک شبکه تعاملی ترسیم شد که در نتیجه عامل پویایی بانکداری در بالاترین سطح قرار گرفت. همچنین، قدر نفوذ ومیزان وابستگی این عوامل نسبت به هم در ماتریس قدرت نفوذ-وابستگی، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.که طبق نتایج حاصله، شاخص پویایی بانکداری و مشتریان هدف در ماتریس قدرت نفوذ-وابستگی درناحیه وابسته یعنی بیشترین میزان وابستگی و کمترین نفوذ و عوامل ارزیابی خدمات، پویایی نیروی انسانی، توسعه سازمان، هنجار ذهنی در ناحیه متصل یعنی بیشترین قدرت نفوذ و بیشترین میان وابستگی قرار دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

the design of co-branding model In banking industry

نویسندگان English

Masoumeh Ghafari Charati
Alireza Rousta
Farzad Asayesh
Nader GharibNavaz
Department of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract
The aim of the current research is to design a joint branding model using the structural-interpretive modeling method. The research method of this study is exploratory in terms of nature, with a mixed approach. In order to collect data and identify factors; the method of content analysis and review of related texts was used, as well as interviews with ten selected experts using a non-random method and snowball technique to achieve theoretical saturation. To achieve the research findings, a matrix questionnaire was constructed. Findings were compiled to determine the relationships between indicators. The data obtained from the questionnaire were analyzed using structural-interpretive modeling and depicted on three levels in an interactive network, as a result of which the factor of banking dynamics was placed at the highest level. Also, the amount of influence and the degree of dependence of these factors on each other were investigated in the matrix of influence-dependency. According to the results, the dynamic index of banking and target customers are located in the matrix of influence-dependency in the dependent area, i.e., the highest degree of dependency; and the least influence and service evaluation factors, human force dynamics, organization development, mental norm are located in the connected area, i.e., the highest power of influence and the highest interdependence.
Introduction
One of the latest brand development approaches is co-branding. Based on the studies, it is expected that joint marketing measures will increase significantly in the coming years. Surveys show that 38% of companies carry out joint marketing measures, including joint branding, at an increasing rate (Nygaard & Dahlstrom, 2023). Rao & Ruekert (2017) defined co-branding as the integration of two or more products in short-term or long-term periods. Of course, these researchers redefined their definition of joint branding in the following years. According to them, this method occurs when two or more existing and independent brands join together in a common product or are marketed together in a similar form (Abbaszadeh et al, 2018).
Considering that the current research is about joint branding in the banking industry, the banking industry is one of the businesses that have grown rapidly in recent times, so that accessibility of the banks is easier than other trades, in any area of an urban environment, and this is also due to many researches that have been done in the field of availability of bank branches; but why should there be so many branches of this industry in a human society, while in modern banking, borders have disappeared? Now, due to the merger of five banks and military financial institutions (Ansar, Qavamin, Kotsar, Hekmat and Mehr Eghtesad Iran) in Sepeh Bank, one of the main concerns is creating a suitable image of the Sepeh brand and presenting a common model for the brand, because neglection to this may have negative consequences on other bank businesses, such as the decrease in deposits, operating profit and the bank's rating in this industry. Based on the mentioned cases, what is the basic problem of the current research of the joint branding model in the banking industry?
Theoretical framework
Despite the different definitions that have been presented in relation to branding, all experts agree that the brand is a very important intangible asset for organizations, and plays an effective role in gaining a competitive advantage (Ruschman, 2020). A brand enables an organization to differentiate its market offerings from competitors. Consequently, strong brands are very important for any type of product, service or organization, including those in the public sector (Drostkar et al, 2022).
Co-branding is a kind of strategic alliance between parties. In recent years, creating strategic alliances with co-branding has become common in many industries, because the co-branding strategy has the ability to achieve significant synergy, which focuses on the unique strengths of each of the co-brands. Rao and Ruckert, at the beginning of their research, defined co-branding as the integration of two or more products in short-term or long-term periods (Labrović et al, 2021). 
Research methodology
The purpose of this research is to provide a local model of joint branding in the banking industry. Therefore, in terms of nature, the research is exploratory with a mixed approach. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) has been used to determine the sequence and relationships between the identified elements. In order to collect data and identify factors, the method of content analysis and review of sources, books and interviews with participants, which include university experts and organization experts who have a series of characteristics such as doctorate degrees and scientific productions (books, articles, etc.) and the background of high performance in this field was used. Also, non-random sampling and snowball technique were used to select experts until theoretical saturation was achieved. MATLAB software was used for interpretive structural modeling (ISM).
Research findings
In this section, the relationships between research factors were analyzed in pairs and couples, and led to structural-interpretive modeling and the use of the relationship between experts' concepts, using the following symbols to determine the relationships between factors. The structural interaction matrix itself is composed of research dimensions and factors and their comparison through four modes of concept relations. The final accessibility matrix (FRM) is formed by applying the existing multiplicative relationships among the factors. In this way, the next stage of the implementation of the ISM methodology can be completed. In this matrix, secondary relationships between factors are controlled.
In order to analyze the power of penetration and the degree of dependence (MICMAK), the factors are classified into four groups. In order to calculate the influence of factors, it is enough to add the number of 1's in each row of the final access matrix. 
Conclusion
In this research, joint branding factors have been identified. After identifying the factors through the achievement matrix, an attempt was made to examine the factors affecting co-branding. Based on the results of the research, the factor of banking dynamics is located at the first level, the factor of target customers at the second level, and the factors of service evaluation factors, human force dynamics, organization development, and mental norm at the third level. Co-branding to support a new product or service has emerged as a legitimate and legal way to develop a brand, especially to establish or maintain competitive advantages, which represents the long-term cooperation strategy of a product by two brands. Considering the increasing intensity of competition in the market, joint branding between companies has become a tool to achieve the interests of both sides of strategic partners. Co-branding can influence consumer perceptions such as trust, confidence, satisfaction and commitment. Therefore, it should be noted that the relationship between partners can be considered as a process, so that the common brand is trusted when that brand is similar to the consumer. This reduces the feeling of discomfort and inconsistency, thereby making the brand more reliable. The ability to trust the product will bring consumer satisfaction, and the consumer in the next step will commit to the brand. And in order to maintain this process, it is necessary to create a competitive advantage by adopting creative and innovative strategies, and competitors cannot imitate it.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Co-branding
human resources
organizational development
banking system
Abbaszadeh, H. Alem Tabriz, A. Iran Dost, M., & Salavati, Adel. (2018). Branding to create consumer value in the country's banking system, Consumer Behavior Studies, 6(1), 193-211 (In Persian).
Ahmadi, F, Askari, A, & Rusta, A. R. (2022). Identifying dimensions and marketing components of Iran's tourism industry customers with a qualitative approach. Journal of  value creating in Business Management (JVCBM), 2(4): 46-60. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.389054.1058
Ahn, J., Kim, A., & Sung, Y. (2021). The effects of sensory fit on consumer evaluations of co-branding. In Leveraged Marketing Communications (pp. 42-59). Routledge.
Drostkar, E. Yaqoubipour, A. Montazeri, M., & Shul, A (2022). Designing the brand promotion model of National Bank of Iran: a mixed approach. Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 11 (41), 29-59. Doi: 11.1862/nh.4155.2. Doi: 10.34785/J018.2019.823 (In Persian).
Garaus, M., Wolfsteiner, E., & Florack, A. (2022). When food co-branding backfires: the overexpectation effect. Foods11(14), 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142136
Gogri, S. (2022). Co-branding: A strategic decision in a competitive world. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS)9(11), 20-23. DOI:10.1057/bm.2000.3
Górska-Warsewicz, H. (2024). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, innovative co-branding partnership, and business performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation20(2), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.7341/20242027
Haas, R., Imami, D., Miftari, I., Ymeri, P., Grunert, K., & Meixner, O. (2021). Consumer Perception of Food Quality and Safety in Western Balkan Countries: Evidence from Albania and Kosovo. Foods 2021, 10, 160. Food, Health and Safety in Cross Cultural Consumer Contexts, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010160
Labrović, J. A., Kovačević, I., Damnjanović, V., & Kostić, S. C. (2021). Employer branding framework using social media for attracting talents. In E-business technologies conference proceedings, 1 (1): 70-73. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/12
Li, K. (2019). How does co-branding influence brand image: A qualitative research on Supreme’s brand image from consumers’ perspectives, Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala University.
Maysami Azad, Safora, Hajiha, Ali, Abdulvand, Mohammad Ali, Khairi, Bahram. (2024). Determinants of green product branding, a model for Iran's food industry. Journal of  value creating in Business Management (JVCBM), 3(4): 89-108. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.408366.1149 (In Persian).
Miao, M., Zhang, J., & Wang, T. (2021). The Impact of Co-branding on Firm Stock Value. International Journal of Business & Applied Sciences10(1), 1-6.
Milberg, S. J., Cuneo, A., Silva, M., & Goodstein, R. C. (2023). Parent brand susceptibility to negative feedback effects from brand extensions: A metaanalysis of experimental consumer findings. Journal of Consumer Psychology33(1), 21-44. DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1282
Mishra, S., Singh, S. N., Fang, X., & Yin, B. (2017). Impact of diversity, quality and number of brand alliance partners on the perceived quality of a new brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management26(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2015-0873
Mohsen, A, Jamshidi, D, & Rusta, A. R. (2023). Providing a model of brand equity to increase market share: based on the perspective of consumer behavior. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 10(4), 160-179. doi: 10.22034/cbsj.2023.62913
Nygaard, A., & Dahlstrom, R. (2023). Better together? How evolution of co-branding alliance affects performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing38(9), 1899-1910. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2022-0304
Pinello, C., Picone, P. M., & Destri, A. M. L. (2022). Co-branding research: where we are and where we could go from here. European Journal of Marketing56(2), 584-621. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2021-0073
Ruschman Jr, D. C. (2020). The branding of Jesuit higher education: branding, marketing, and collaboration at four Jesuit universities in the United States, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama.
Szakály, Z., Soós, M., Balsa-Budai, N., Kovács, S., & Kontor, E. (2020). The effect of an evaluative label on consumer perception of cheeses in Hungary. Foods9(5), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050563.
Taheri, L, Asayesh, F, & Rusta, A. R. (2024). Presenting the local model of increasing the market share in Iran's dairy industry with a qualitative approach. Journal of value creating in Business Management (JVCBM), 4(2), doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.402286.1117
Zha, D., Melewar, T. C., Foroudi, P., & Jin, Z. (2020). An assessment of brand experience knowledge literature: Using bibliometric data to identify future research direction. International Journal of Management Reviews22(3), 287-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12226
Zhang, Q., Chen, J., & Lin, J. (2022). Market targeting with social influences and risk aversion in a co-branding alliance. European Journal of Operational Research297(1), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.022

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 خرداد 1403