Investigating the impact of open enablers on the agility of selected small and medium enterprises in Yazd Industrial Estate

Document Type : Original Article (Quantified)

Authors

1 1. PhD student, Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of open innovation, social capital, collaborative knowledge creation, and cooperation with foreign partners to increase agility in today's turbulent world, and provide a new model for applying open agility enablers in selected small and medium enterprises of Yazd Industrial City. The research method used in this research is applicable in terms of purpose, and it is a descriptive-survey type of research. The statistical population of this research includes experts from top and middle managers of 17 selected small and medium companies in Yazd Industrial City, totaling 92 people. Due to the limited availability of the population, the census method was used to collect data; and finally 89 questionnaires were returned. The data collection tools include the questionnaires of collaborative knowledge creation by Al-Amoush et al., (2020), organizational agility by Lee et al., (2015), social capital by Liu et al., (2016), cooperation with external partners by Rezazadeh and Nobari (2018), and open innovation by Chen and Liu (2018). Smart PLS software was used to check the validity, reliability and fit of the conceptual model of the research, and the validity and reliability of the questionnaire questions were confirmed. The research results showed that all 4 research hypotheses were confirmed based on the significant values ​​of the hypotheses. Therefore, organizational agility is significantly influenced by open innovation followed by cooperation with foreign partners and the creation of collaborative knowledge, and social capital has a positive and significant effect on the creation of collaborative knowledge in small and medium-sized companies selected in Yazd Industrial City.
Introduction
In a rapidly changing business environment, organizations often face challenges such as market turbulence, competitive pressures, and unexpected disruptions (Baškarada & Koronios, 2018). To progress in today's dynamic environment, organizations must have the ability and agility to adapt to these changes and make new adjustments and increase their innovation capacity (Audretsch & Belitski, 2023), which agility plays an important role in the activities of different areas of the organization to help responding to changes (Rezaei Sadrabadi & Karimi, 2022). The goal of organizational agility is to create satisfied customers and employees and a set of necessary capacities to respond to changes in the business environment, therefore, increasing organizational agility is necessary (Nikkhah, 2022). But traditional competitive strategies are ineffective in facing the uncertainty in today's working conditions (Arsawan et al, 2020) and more openness of the business model and the dissolution of closed organizational boundaries are obviously needed to maintain competition in this evolving landscape (Redlich et al, 2008), and companies need agility, innovation, and flexibility with an open approach to maintain their share in the market. This is especially important for small and medium-sized companies that have limited financial resources, human resources, and research and development. Since creating agility and innovation requires a lot of investment in the field of human resources and research and development, agility and innovation with an open approach is a fast and efficient way to acquire the necessary resources and capabilities (Mirfakhradini & Rezaei Sadrabadi, 2020). Considering that many small and medium companies in Yazd Industrial City use closed management methods and processes and avoid communication with the external environment and cooperation with foreign partners, it prevents them from acquiring more knowledge, agility and sufficient flexibility. Therefore, in order to achieve open capabilities in agility, more research should be done on the prerequisites and enablers of open agility in today's new conditions and in accordance with the small and medium enterprises of Yazd Industrial City. Therefore, in this research, we are looking for an answer to this question: what is the effect of open enablers on the agility of selected small and medium companies in Yazd Industrial City?
Theoretical Framework
Organizational agility and dynamic capabilities in small and medium enterprises
Organizational agility is rooted in the two main concepts of reactive adaptation and organizational flexibility (Sherehiy et al, 2007), which shows the ability to recognize specific environmental conditions and quickly deal with changes in resources, business processes, and organizational strategies (Žitkiene & Deksnys, 2018). In the sector of small and medium enterprises, adaptation and quick response to issues and problems will be necessary for future development (Liu & Yang, 2020). Basically, organizational agility can be introduced as the ability to respond with the aim of identifying and implementing a more efficient approach in a complex environment (Panda & Rath, 2016).
Social capital and collaborative knowledge creation
Researches in the past investigated the function of social capital in supporting knowledge management to achieve sustainable performance (Tu, 2020). Social networks in the organization can act as a channel for transferring and integrating knowledge, in a way that improves the creation of dynamic ideas, new values ​​and their sharing (Ode & Ayavoo, 2020). Collaborative knowledge creation is introduced as a collaborative approach (Calantone et al, 2002) in creating and developing knowledge between partners in order to improve insight into changes (Zhao et al, 2020).
Open innovation and organizational agility
Open innovation reduces the risks associated with trial and error by providing access to diverse and complementary knowledge. It acts as a catalyst for a company's innovation engine, and offers exceptional flexibility (Bianchi et al., 2016). In addition, the approach of using external resources fosters the continuous exchange of knowledge with colleagues, thereby increasing knowledge diffusion (Scuotto et al., 2017). Open innovation enables companies to save significant time and resources needed to develop market-specific knowledge to exploit opportunities (Lee et al, 2015).
Collaboration with external partners and agility
Collaboration is considered as a useful strategy for making companies agile thanks to access to the other party's resources and knowledge during the implementation of joint projects (Sanchez & Nagi, 2001). Cooperating with an agile company makes the main capabilities and competencies of the other party, which are more adaptable and responsive to the demands and rapid changes of customer markets, to be jointly exploited (Yusuf et al, 2014).
Motwani & Katatria (2024) in a review study investigated the concept of organizational agility and its relevance in today's dynamic business environment in order to identify the key factors affecting organizational agility and the benefits associated with cultivating agility. The results showed that organizational agility is important in three basic aspects: strategic level or market investment level, internal operation level, and individual level.
Arifin & Purwanti (2023) investigated the role of leadership agility, organizational culture, and motivation on organizational agility. In general, this research emphasizes the importance of leadership agility, organizational culture, and motivation in guiding and sustaining organizational agility. The findings emphasize the importance of training agile leaders, fostering a supportive culture, and fostering employee motivation to enhance an organization's ability to adapt, innovate, and thrive in a dynamic business environment.
Research methodology
The research method used in this research is applicable in terms of purpose, and it is a descriptive-survey type of research. The statistical population of this research includes experts from top and middle managers of 17 selected small and medium companies in Yazd Industrial City, totaling 92 people. Due to the limited availability of the population, the census method was used to collect data; and finally 89 questionnaires were returned. The data collection tools include the questionnaires of collaborative knowledge creation by Al-Amoush et al., (2020), organizational agility by Lee et al., (2015), social capital by Liu et al., (2016), cooperation with external partners by Rezazadeh and Nobari (2018), and open innovation by Chen and Liu (2018). Smart PLS software was used to check the validity, reliability and fit of the conceptual model of the research conceptual model.
Research findings
Based on the significant values ​​obtained in the hypothesis test, all 4 research hypotheses were confirmed. The findings of the research show that open innovation as far as 55.4%, cooperation with foreign partners 20.6%, and collaborative knowledge creation 24.3% impact on the organizational agility of small and medium-sized companies selected in Yazd Industrial Town; and social capital 84.8% impacts on the creation of cooperative knowledge of selected small and medium companies in Yazd Industrial Town.
Conclusion
The current research was conducted with the aim of identifying and investigating the impact of open enablers on the organizational agility of small and medium-sized companies selected in Yazd Industrial City, and investigated the impact of cooperation with foreign partners, collaborative knowledge creation, and open innovation on agility. The results of this research are consistent with the results of Chung et al, (2019), Al-Omoush et al, (2020), Cepeda & Arias-Pérez (2019), Ravichandran (2018), and Ahmadi & Ershadi (2021).
The results of the first hypothesis show that the existence of social capital in selected small and medium companies of Yazd Industrial City can lead to an increase in collaborative knowledge creation in them. Therefore, creating a mechanism for the interaction of all social resources directly and indirectly for the use of social capital in selected small and medium companies of Yazd Industrial City will lead to the production of more collaborative knowledge.
The results of the second hypothesis show that the creation of collaborative knowledge in selected small and medium companies of Yazd Industrial City can lead to an increase in organizational agility. Therefore, in order to use collaborative knowledge capital, companies must have an open and cooperative model and increase agility.
The results of the third hypothesis show that cooperation with foreign partners can lead to the improvement of organizational agility in selected small and medium-sized companies in Yazd Industrial City. Therefore, by cooperating with foreign partners, companies are more successful in achieving agility and responding to the market due to access to more external resources.
The results of the fourth hypothesis show that open innovation can lead to an increase in organizational agility in selected small and medium-sized companies in Yazd Industrial City. Therefore, by using open innovation, companies can identify and use more resources and opportunities and increase agility.
According to the results of this research, the following suggestions are presented:
Companies should seek to identify suitable external partners and provide opportunities for collaborative knowledge creation and create online knowledge bases for storing and sharing knowledge and information, creating an organizational culture suitable for open innovation, and creating an atmosphere of cooperation with universities, research centers, and other companies to develop innovative ideas.

Keywords

Subjects


Ahmadi, S.; Ershadi, M.J. (2021). Investigating the role of social networking technology on the organizational agility: A structural equation modeling approach. J. Adv. Manag. Res, 18, 568–584. DOI: 10.1108/JAMR-04-2020-0052
Al-Omoush, K. S. (2021). The role of top management support and organizational capabilities in achieving e-business entrepreneurship. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1163-1179. DOI: 10.1108/K-12-2019-0851
Al-Omoush, K.S.; Simón-Moya, V.; Sendra-García, J. (2020). The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. J. Innov. Knowl, 5, 279–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2020.10.002
Arain, G.A.; Bhatti, Z.A.; Hameed, I.; Fang, Y.H. (2020). Top-down knowledge hiding and innovative work behavior (IWB): A three-way moderated-mediation analysis of self-effcacy and local/foreign status. J. Knowl. Manag, 24, 127–149. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-11-2018-0687
Arifin, R., & Purwanti, H. (2023). Examining the Influence of Leadership Agility, Organizational Culture, and Motivation on Organizational Agility: A Comprehensive Analysis. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 3(1), 33 - 54. DOI:10.52970/grhrm.v3i1.205
Arsawan, I.W.E.; Koval, V.; Rajiani, I.; Rustiarini, N.W.; Supartha, W.G.; Suryantini, N.P.S. (2020). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation culture into SMEs sustainable competitive advantage. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag, 71, 405–428. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0192
Audretsch, B. D., & Belitski, M. (2023). The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance. Technovation, 119, 102519. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102519
Azudin, A.; Mansor, N. (2018). Management accounting practices of SMEs: The impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev, 23, 222–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.014
Baškarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2018). The 5S organizational agility framework: a dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 331-342. DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-05-2017-1163
Bianchi, M., A. Croce, C. Dell’Era, C. A. Di Benedetto, and F. Frattini. (2016). “Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 33 (4): 492–510. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12302
Bottani, E. (2009). A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 380–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.02.013
Bouton, E.; Tal, S.B.; Asterhan, C.S.C. (2021). Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing. Internet High. Educ, 49, 100787. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787
Cai, Z.; Liu, H.; Huang, Q.; Liang, L. (2019). Developing organizational agility in product innovation: The roles of IT capability, KM capability, and innovative climate. R D Manag, 49, 421–438. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12305
Calantone, R.J.; Cavusgil, S.T.; Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, frm innovation capability, and frm performance. Ind. Mark. Manag, 31, 515–524. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
Cegarra-Navarro, J.G.; Martelo-Landroguez, S. (2020). The effect of organizational memory on organizational agility: Testing the role of counter-knowledge and knowledge application. J. Intellect. Cap, 21, 459–479. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-03-2019-0048
Cepeda, J.; Arias-Pérez, J. (2019). Information technology capabilities and organizational agility: The mediating effects of open innovation capabilities. Multinatl. Bus. Rev, 27, 198–216. DOI: 10.1108/MBR-11-2017-0088
Chan, J.I.L.; Muthuveloo, R. (2020). Vital organisational capabilities for strategic agility: An empirical study. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm, 12, 223–236. DOI: 10.1108/APJBA-12-2019-0261
Chang, F.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, C.; Ding, K.; Cheng, W.; Chang, F. (2021). A maintenance decision-making oriented collaborative cross- organization knowledge sharing blockchain network for complex multi-component systems. J. Clean. Prod, 282, 124541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124541
Chege, S.M.; Wang, D. (2020). The infuence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya. Technol. Soc, 60, 101210. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101210
Chen, L.; Zheng, W.; Yang, B.; Bai, S. (2016). Transformational leadership, social capital and organizational innovation. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J, 37, 843–859. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0157
Chen, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). How does openness to innovation drive organizational ambidexterity? The mediating role of organizational learning goal orientation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(2), 156-169. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2018.2834505
Chung, T. T. R., Liang, T. P., Peng, C. H., Chen, D. N., & Sharma, P. (2019). Knowledge creation and organizational performance: moderating and mediating processes from an organizational agility perspective. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2), 79-106. DOI: 10.17705/1thci.00114
Cosenz, F.; Bivona, E. (2021). Fostering growth patterns of SMEs through business model innovation. A tailored dynamic business modelling approach. J. Bus. Res, 130, 658–669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.003
Dabi´c, M.; Stojˇci´c, N.; Simi´c, M.; Potocan, V.; Slavkovi´c, M.; Nedelko, Z. (2021). Intellectual agility and innovation in micro and small businesses: The mediating role of entrepreneurial leadership. J. Bus. Res, 123, 683–695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.013
Faccin, K.; Balestrin, A. (2018). The dynamics of collaborative practices for knowledge creation in joint R&D projects. J. Eng. Technol.Manag, 48, 28–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.001
Falahat, M.; Ramayah, T.; Soto-Acosta, P.; Lee, Y.Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs’ international performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 152, 119908. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119908
Gavrila, S.G.; Ancillo, A.d.L. (2021). Spanish SMEs’ digitalization enablers: E-Receipt applications to the offine retail market. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 162, 120381. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120381
Hu, Y., P. McNamara, and D. McLoughlin. (2014). “Outbound Open Innovation in Bio-Pharmaceutical Out-Licensing.” Technovation 35 (46): 46–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.004
Kanan, Seyyed Mohsen, Rogi, Manouchehr, & Khamse, Abbas. (2024). Identifying the components of the open innovation maturity model in Iran's defense industries based on metacombination method. Quarterly Journal of Value Creation in Business Management, 3(3), 158-179. DOI: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.404151.1126. (in Persian)
Khan, S.H.; Majid, A.; Yasir, M. (2020). Strategic renewal of SMEs: The impact of social capital, strategic agility and absorptive capacity. Manag. Decis, 59, 1877–1894. DOI: 10.1108/MD-12-2019-1722
King, S.; Lusher, D.; Hopkins, J.; Simpson, G.W. (2020). Industrial symbiosis in Australia: The social relations of making contact in a matchmaking marketplace for SMEs. J. Clean. Prod, 270, 122146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122146
Lee, O. K., V. Sambamurthy, K. H. Lim, and K. K. Wei. (2015). “How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? Information Systems Research 26 (2): 398–417. DOI: 10.1287/isre.2015.0577
Liu, H. M., & Yang, H. F. (2020). Network resource meets organizational agility: Creating an idiosyncratic competitive advantage for SMEs. Management Decision, 58(1), 58-75. DOI: 10.1108/MD-10-2017-1061
Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Lu, Y. (2016). The effects of social capital on firm substantive and symbolic performance: In the context of E-Business. Journal of Global Information Management, 24(1), 61–85. DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.2016010104
Madhok, A., & Marques, R. (2014). Towards an action-based perspective on firm competitiveness. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 77–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.002
Meijer, L.L.J.; Huijben, J.C.C.M.; van Boxstael, A.; Romme, A.G.L. (2019). Barriers and drivers for technology commercialization by SMEs in the Dutch sustainable energy sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 112, 114–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.050
Mikalef, P., and A. Pateli. (2017). “Information Technology-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Their Indirect Effect on Competitive Performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA.” Journal of Business Research 70: 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004
Mirfakhradini, Seyed Haider, Destranj, Meytham, & Karimi Teklo, Salim. (2014). Designing a conceptual model for the development of open innovation in science and technology parks using factor analysis. Public Management Research, 8(27), 71-98. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2015.2063. (in Persian)
Mirfakhradini, Seyed Haider, Safari, Khalil, & Shabani, Akram. (2016). Investigating the impact of customer participation in new product development in Yazd tile and ceramic industries. Industrial Technology Development Quarterly, 15(30), 37-46. 20.1001.1.26765403.1396.15.30.4.1. (in Persian)
Mirfakhradini, Seyed Heydar and Rezaei SadrAbadi, Zahra. (2020). Presenting a model of factors affecting the implementation of open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach,17th International Management Conference, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1162075/
Motwani, J. and Katatria, A. (2024), "Organization agility: a literature review and research agenda", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.  DOI:10.1108/IJPPM-07-2023-0383
Nafei, W. (2016). The role of organizational agility in reinforcing job engagement: A study on industrial companies in Egypt. International Business Research, 9(2), 153–167. DOI:10.5539/ibrv9n2p153
Nikkhah, Yunus. (2022). The mediating role of organizational agility in the relationship between outsourcing and organizational productivity in gas company. Quarterly Journal of Value Creation in Business Management, 2(2), 16-33. DOI: 10.22034/jbme.2022.335002.1017. (in Persian)
Nonaka, I.; von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci, 20, 635–652. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
Ode, E.; Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and frm innovation. J. Innov. Knowl, 5, 210–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
Panda, S.; Rath, S.K. (2016). Investigating the structural linkage between IT capability and organizational agility: A study on Indian fnancial enterprises. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag, 29, 751–773. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0033
Quaye, D. (2019). Marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs in Ghana. Manag. Decis, 57, 1535–1553. DOI: 10.1108/MD-08-2017-0784
Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. J. Strateg.Inf. Syst, 27, 22–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.002
Redlich, T. O. B. I. A. S., Wulfsberg, J. P., & Bruhns, F. L. (2008). Virtual factory for customized open production. In 15th international product development management conference, Tagungsband. DOI: 10.3139/104.110111
Rezaei Sadrabadi, Zahra and Karimi, Tandis. (2022). presenting the model of marketing agility enablers in small and medium enterprises, the 10th International Conference on Management, Accounting and Economic Development, https://civilica.com/doc/1663921. (in Persian)
Rezazadeh, A., & Nobari, N. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of cooperative entrepreneurship: A conceptual model and empirical investigation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 479-507. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-017-0470-7
Sanchez, L. M., & Nagi, R. (2001). A review of agile manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 39(16), 3561–3600. DOI: 10.1080/00207540110068790
Scuotto, V., M. Del Giudice, S. Bresciani, and D. Meissner. (2017). “Knowledge Driven Preferences in Informal Inbound Open Innovation Modes. An Explorative View on Small to Medium Enterprises.” Journal of Knowledge Management 21 (3): 640–655. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0465
Sherehiy, B.; Karwowski, W.; Layer, J.K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. Int. J. Ind. Ergon, 37, 445–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007
Stekelorum, R.; Laguir, I.; ElBaz, J. (2020). Can you hear the Eco? From SME environmental responsibility to social requirements in the supply chain. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 158, 120169. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120169
Teece, D., M. Peteraf, and S. Leih. (2016). “Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy.” California Management Review 58 (4): 13–35. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Tu, J. (2020). The role of dyadic social capital in enhancing collaborative knowledge creation. J. Informetr, 14, 101034. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101034
Wageeh, N.A. (2016). Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success. Int. J. Bus. Manag, 11, 296. DOI: 10.5539/IJBM.V11N5P296
Walter, A.T. (2021). Organizational agility: Ill-defned and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. Manage. Rev. Q, 71, 343–391. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6
Wang, C.; Hu, Q. (2020). Technovation Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94–95, 102010. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
Wang, S., R. A. Noe, and Z.-M. Wang. (2014). “Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems: A Quasi–Field Experiment.” Journal of Management 40 (4): 978–1009. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311412192
Weaven, S.; Quach, S.; Thaichon, P.; Frazer, L.; Billot, K.; Grace, D. (2021). Surviving an economic downturn: Dynamic capabilities of SMEs. J. Bus. Res, 128, 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.009
Yildiz, T., & Aykanat, Z. (2021). The mediating role of organizational innovation on the impact of strategic agility on firm performance. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 765-786. DOI: 10.1108/WJEMSD-06-2020-0070
Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., Dauda, M., El-Berishy, N. M., & Cang, S. (2014). A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 531–543. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.009
Zhao, S.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, X.; Hong, J. (2020). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: Do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter? Eur. J. Innov. Manag, 24, 371–394. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0244
Zhou, J.; Bi, G.; Liu, H.; Fang, Y.; Hua, Z. Understanding employee competence, operational IS alignment, and organizational agility—An ambidexterity perspective. (2018). Inf. Manag, 55, 695–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2018.02.002
Žitkiene, R.; Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational agility conceptual model. ˙ Montenegrin J. Econ, 14, 115–129. DOI: 10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7
Zoghi, Mehdi, Rabiei Mandjin, Mohammadreza, & Amirkabiri, Alireza. (2024). The effect of environmental stimuli on the implementation of the agility policy in logistics villages of Tehran province. Quarterly Journal of Value Creation in Business Management, 3(4), 296-314. DOI: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.389178.1063. (in Persian)

  • Receive Date 23 February 2024
  • Revise Date 14 July 2024
  • Accept Date 27 July 2024