Identifying the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization model in the Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company

Zamani Fard, Mohammad Hasan; Salajeghe, Sanjar; Jalal Kamali, Mohammad; Fatehi Rad, Navid

doi:10.22034/jvcbm.2025.506148.1501

Identifying the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization model in the Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company

Document Type : Original Article (Mixed)

Authors

mohammad hasan zamani fard ¹

sanjar salajeghe ²

mohammad jalal kamali ²

Navid Fatehi Rad ²

¹ PhD student in Public Administration, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.

² Department of Public Administration, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/jvcbm.2025.506148.1501

Abstract

Abstract
The aim of the present study is to identify the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization Model in Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company with a thematic analysis approach. This study has a mixed approach that is developmental-applied in terms of purpose and survey in terms of nature and method. The data collection method in this study was a combination of library and field studies, and the data collection tools were referring to documents, interviews with experts, and a questionnaire, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed with a high percentage. The statistical population of this study included 17 university professors, experts in the field of knowledge management, and senior managers of the Water and Wastewater Company, who were selected through purposive sampling; in this qualitative study, NVIVO version 11 software was used to extract and analyze the codes related to the interviews with experts, and SPSS version 26 software was used in the quantitative part. The results of open coding of the collected qualitative data led to the extraction of 92 initial codes, 30 basic themes, and 10 organizing themes: knowledge-based leadership of the organization, knowledge-based human resources of the organization, expansion and promotion of knowledge culture, leadership of the organization's knowledge infrastructure, developmental orientation to knowledge processes, organization of new knowledge, belief in innovation in the organization, capacity building in the organization, improvement of efficiency and productivity in the organization, and improvement of the organization's quality; of which 79 codes related to the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization Model in the Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company were approved by experts in the fuzzy Delphi process.
Introduction
Postponing the implementation of knowledge management in the structural area causes a loss of national capital and increases costs in various sectors. Since documentation plays a significant role in knowledge management in carrying out operations, it can prevent the waste of national capital in this important and influential area in the country, and this makes the successful implementation of knowledge management in company activities essential (Damavandi & Khajouei, 2024). The latest effort to establish the knowledge management process in the country's executive agencies is the notification of the Knowledge Management Regulation of Executive Agencies by the Administrative and Employment Organization of the country, which has obliged all executive agencies to establish a knowledge management system in the shortest possible time. The Knowledge Management Regulations and Guidelines in the country's executive agencies emphasize that every person has a set of experiences, knowledge, and intelligence in the field of their job that may not be recorded anywhere and remain hidden, and this guideline has been prepared to access such knowledge and experiences. According to this guideline, knowledge is a set of learnings and experiences acquired objectively and implicitly related to work, such as ideas and creativity, skills, knowledge documentation, problem-solving methods, content of specialized and expert meetings, and project criticism, whose management should be emphasized (Garai, 2022). Due to the many benefits of implementing and implementing knowledge management in recent years, many organizations have invested in and been successful in the field of knowledge development at different levels, so that the implementation of this management system has had a great impact on the performance of these organizations (Kianto et al., 2019). This is while many organizations have also failed in this field. Therefore, the lack of proper mechanisms for evaluating and implementing knowledge management has turned this type of investment into an additional cost in the minds of managers; therefore, it is necessary for organizations to have a proper foundation before any action in the field of implementing knowledge management, to know their knowledge needs, and to use appropriate methods to meet these needs (Hu et al., 2024). For this purpose, organizations have turned to using maturity assessment models. These models are used as a basis for evaluation and comparison with the state of improvement and with the aim of adopting a conscious approach to increasing the capabilities of certain areas in the organization, which has its own characteristics based on the basic assumptions of its developers (Paliwal et al., 2024).
For this reason, the main problem of the present study is the lack of research based on the design of a knowledge management validation model based on the Asian Productivity Organization (APO) model. The issue of the need to pay attention to knowledge management in Iran has also been considered a national priority in upstream documents and development plans of the country. This is while in upstream documents, including the strategic document of the Ministry of Energy, approved in May 2013, having knowledge-based management, efficient human resources, a comprehensive and effective structure, rich software and hardware capacities of self-reliance, acts in such a way that the country is recognized as a leader in the world in supply and demand management and equitable access for all to reliable and stable electricity, safe and sufficient water commensurate with national capacities, and sanitation services. In recent years, knowledge management has been the focus of attention of the country's Water and Wastewater Engineering Company as a strategic issue. Accordingly, steps have been taken to document the experiences of experts and to place knowledge management on the list of research priorities of this company. In this regard, Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company, as one of the subsidiaries of the Ministry of Energy, should move towards knowledge management maturity in the path of realizing the announced strategies. Accordingly, the question that this research seeks to answer is: What are the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization model in Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company with a content analysis approach?
Methodology
Given that the aim of the present study is to identify the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization Model in Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company with a thematic analysis approach; the research method is fundamental-applied in terms of purpose and mixed (quantitative and qualitative) in terms of data collection method, cross-sectional in terms of data collection time, and survey in terms of the nature of the research. In this study, in order to explain the dimensions of the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization Model in Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company with a thematic analysis approach, first the codes and themes of the research variables were identified through library studies (referring to written documents such as books, magazines, etc.) and interviews with experts. Then, in order to finalize the list of dimensions and components, a survey method of experts using the fuzzy Delphi method was used.
The statistical population of the study included university professors, experts in the field of knowledge management, and senior managers of the Water and Wastewater Company; who had the information required for the study. The work experience of the experts in the field of knowledge management, the presence of experts from senior management positions in water and wastewater companies, theoretical mastery, practical experience, willingness and ability to participate in research, having at least 15 years of work experience to participate in the research interview, and the presence of university experts with relevant academic education compared to professional experts are the main characteristics of the research experts. The sample size of the research consists of 17 people and they were selected using the purposive sampling method. The measurement tools in this study were library studies, interviews, and questionnaires. The interviews were semi-structured, that is, according to the personality and behavioral requirements and the interview time, which in this study is between 30 and 60 minutes. In this study, a total of 17 experts were interviewed. From the thirteenth interview onwards, repetition was observed in the information received. This means that the research sampling reached saturation in the fourteenth interview, but for reliability, interviews continued with three other experts.
Discussion and Results
The results showed that the extracted concepts related to the knowledge management model based on the Asian Productivity Organization model in Fars Province Water and Wastewater Company included 92 primary codes, 30 basic themes, and 10 organizing themes.
Considering the views presented in the first stage and comparing it with the results of the second stage, if the difference between the definite fuzzy mean in the two stages is less than (0.1), it means that the experts have reached a consensus on the primary code in question. The results show that the experts have reached a consensus on 79 themes. On the other hand, if the average of each theme in the second stage of the survey is less than the threshold (0.7), the theme in question should be removed. In the studies conducted, the average of the five themes in the second stage, numbers 3, 8, 17, 21, and 32, was less than (0.7); therefore, the aforementioned themes were removed from the study process. Also, the results of Table 5 show that the expert group members did not reach a consensus on topics 38, 44, 51, 59, 70, 81, 85, and 90, and the level of disagreement in the first and second stages was greater than the threshold (0.1); therefore, the survey on the above topics that did not reach a conclusion in the second stage will continue in the third stage.
Conclusion
The Asian Productivity Organization’s Knowledge Management Assessment Tool is a systematic way to identify areas where an organization should focus its knowledge management initiatives, and its results can provide a good understanding of the level of readiness of organizations at the knowledge management levels. Organizations should gradually move towards higher levels in a systematic plan, namely, comprehensive development and implementation of knowledge management, continuous refinement and evaluation of knowledge management programs, and maturity and mainstreaming of knowledge management, and form a systems thinking in the company. Systems thinking gives managers a new perspective and causes the needs and connections between organizational units to increase. This makes intra-organizational problems easier to solve, and employee responsibility and commitment also increase. Also, having a systems perspective and an open learning space in organizations improves trust and responsibility among the organization’s people, and this responsibility itself can lead to increased and improved performance.

Keywords

Knowledge Management

Asian Productivity Organization Model

Organizational Knowledge Human Resources

Knowledge-Based Leadership

Subjects

Human resource management

Abbasi, R., & Nazari, F. (2021). Identifying and ranking factors affecting the success of implementing knowledge management in Khuzestan Province Gas Company using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Information Management Sciences and Techniques, 7(4), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2020.5938.1439. (In Persian).

Agha Gholizadeh Siyar, A; Rahimi, K; Gharaipour, R; Hassani, Z; (2022). Strategic Model of the Effect of Knowledge Management on Production Rate with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach, Strategic Management Research, Issue 84, pp: 13- 38.20.1001.1.22285067.1401.28.84.1.5 (In Persian).

Ahmadvand, D. Ghorbanizadeh, V; Alvani, S.M; Hosseinpour, D; (2022). Knowledge Management Model in the Energy Policy-Making Network of the Country, Organizational Knowledge Management, Issue 17, 11-48. 20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.2.1.7 (In Persian).

Al-Emran, M., V. Mezhuyev, & A. Kamaludin.2020. Towards a conceptual model for examining the impact of knowledge management factors on mobile learning acceptance. Technology in Society 61: 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101247

Amel riazatkosh E., Khayat Moghadam S., Rezaei Far H. (2018). Predicting Knowledge Management through Professional Ethics. Ethics in Science and Technology. 13 (1): 48-55. 20.1001.1.22517634.1397.13.1.6.8 (In Persian).

amidi M, hashemzadeh G, & Alizadeh A. (2019). Knowledge Management Pattern for Oil Industry Based On Grounded Theory Considering Technical and Human Related Issues. Strategic studies in the oil and energy industry, 10 (39):97-126. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-383-fa.html (In Persian).

Barrantes-Briceño, ch., Santos, f., & Nagano, m., (2024). Bridging excellence, knowledge management and sustainability: Introducing the ‘Knowledge Management Excellence Model 21′, a model for sustainable development goals alignment. Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 455, 25 May 2024, 142326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142326

Damavandi, S., & Khajouei, H. (2024). Exploring the Asian Productivity Organization model in Iranian electricity distribution companies: an importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 15(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2024.144157(In Persian).

Danesh Fard, K., & Zakeri, M., (2015) Knowledge Management, Principles, Processes and Functions, Saffar Publications, First Edition (In Persian).

Dehghani, M., Yaghoubi, Noor Mohammad, Moghuli, Alireza, and Vazvi, Zahra. (2019). Presenting a comprehensive model of factors affecting the effective establishment of knowledge management. A New Approach to Educational Management, 10(1 (37th issue), 109-132. 20.1001.1.20086369.1398.10.37.6.0 (In Persian).

Dindar, A; Hami, M; Shojaei, V; (2024). Designing a knowledge management model in the Tehran Municipality Sports Organization, Sports Management, Issue 66, PP: 84- 97. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2022.334647.2858 (In Persian).

Garai, E; (2022). Obstacles to the establishment of knowledge management in the executive bodies of Lorestan Province, Information Management Sciences and Techniques, Issue 28, pp: 83 -119. (In Persian).

Ghasemi, B., & Valmohammadi, Ch. (2018). Designing a World-Class Knowledge Management Maturity Model Based on the Excellence Model: A Mixed Approach. Public Management Research, 11(40), 82-107. 10.22111/JMR.2018.4295(In Persian).

Ghorbani Zadeh, V; Zarandi, S; Sasanian Asl, S; (2016). Pathology of Organizational Knowledge Management Using the Stable Systems Model Case Study: Alborz Province Industry, Mining and Trade Organization, Human Resources Studies, Issue 22, Scientific-Research, pp: 1-28. (In Persian).

Hojjati, R.; Masoudi Nadushan, E.; Shahmohammadi, N., & Sobhani Nejad, M. (2018) Design and validation of knowledge management model for university staff, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, Spring Special Issue, 509-526. https://www.jiera.ir/article_65012.html (In Persian).

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hu, L., Zhou, J., Zhang, J. Z., & Behl, A. (2024). Blockchain technology adaptation and organizational inertia: moderating role between knowledge management processes and supply chain resilience. Kybernetes, 53(2), 515-542. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1661

Iqbal, A. Latif, F. Marimon, F. Sahibzada, U. & Hussain, S. (2019), “From knowledge management to organizational performance”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 36-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2018-0083

Islam, M.A., Agarwal, N.K. & Ikeda, M. (2017). Effect of knowledge management on service innovation in academic libraries. IFLA Journal, 43(3): 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035217710538

Jolodari Mamghani, B. (2016) Knowledge Management (Processes, Tools and Deployment Techniques), Second Edition, Iran Industrial Education and Research Center Publications. (In Persian).

Khademizadeh, sh. Mohammadi, Z. Kouhirostami, M. & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2024). Presenting a knowledge management model in universities, Organizational Knowledge Management, Year 7, Issue 25, PP: 75-106. 10.22034/jkm.2024.238054.1751(In Persian).

Kianto, A., Shujahat, M., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., & Ali, M. (2019). The impact of knowledge management on knowledge worker productivity. Baltic journal of management, 14(2), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2017-0404

Lei, H., Khamkhoutlavong, M., & Le, P. B. (2021). Fostering exploitative and exploratory innovation through HRM practices and knowledge management capability: the moderating effect of knowledge-centered culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 1926-1946. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0505

Mohammad Ismail, S; Hamidi, F; (2022). Identifying and ranking spiritual motivational factors effective in establishing knowledge management (using fuzzy DEMATEL technique), Information Management Sciences and Techniques, No. 29, PP: 187 -212. 10.22091/STIM.2022.7521.1683 (In Persian).

Mohammadi, M., Zamani, H., Mehralizadeh, Y., Turkzadeh, J., & Salimi, Gh. (2018). Pathology of knowledge management maturity with a strategy-oriented approach (Case study: Khuzestan Regional Electricity Company). Human Resources Education and Development, 5(), 131-158. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255555/fa (In Persian).

Pahlevanzadeh, M; Motlabi, D; Bab Al-Hawaeji, F; Hariri, N; (2024). Designing a Performance Evaluation Model for Knowledge Management Systems in the Software Industry Using Neural Networks Journal, Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, Issue 39, pp: 114-148. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2023.74828.1595 (In Persian).

Paliwal, M., Dikkatwar, R., Chatradhi, N., & Valeri, M. (2024). Evolution of research in knowledge management and competitive advantage. In Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing: Business Strategies and an Emerging Theoretical Field (pp. 3-22). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37868-3_1

Qilichli, B., & Ebrahimi, Sh. (2016). Feasibility study of knowledge management establishment with the Asian Productivity Organization (APO) approach. Public Administration Perspective, -(25), 95-114. 20.1001.1.22516069.1395.7.1.4.5 (In Persian).

Rafi, N., Ahmed, A., Shafique, I., & Kalyar, M.N. (2021). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational agility as liaisons of business performance. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 11(4), 394-417 https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2020- 0145.

Safarnejad Samrin, M; Shahcheraghi, A; Zabihi, H; (2021). Explaining the theoretical model of the knowledge management process in building automated design intelligence, Information Processing and Management, Issue 105, pp: 923- 943. 10.52547/JIPM.36.4.923 (In Persian).

Shafiei, S., Moradi, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2018). Evaluating the level of knowledge management maturity based on the APO framework (Case study: Central and faculty libraries of Razi University). Library and Information Organization Studies (National Library and Information Organization Studies), 29(4 (serial 116), 143-155. doi: 10.22054/jks.2020.48833.1261(In Persian).

Sun, Y., Shahzad, M., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Sustainable organizational performance through blockchain technology adoption and knowledge management in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100247.

Suominen, A. & Toivanen, H. (2016). Map of science with topic modeling: comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 67(10): 2464–2476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23596

Wang, S., Abbas, J., Sial, M. S., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Cioca, L. I. (2022). Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. Journal of innovation & knowledge, 7(4), 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100272

Wickramasinghe, N., & D. Rubitz(2007). Knoeledge based Enterprise: Theories and Fundamentals.Oakland USA: Idea Group Publishing.

Zia, U., Zhang, J., & Alam, S. (2024). Role of tacit knowledge management process and innovation capability for stimulating organizational performance: empirical analysis, PLS-SEM approach. Kybernetes, 53(11), 4976-5000. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0444