Predictive factors' modeling of entrepreneurial opportunities in international companies

Document Type : Original Article (Qualitative)

Authors

1 PhD Student in Business Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

2 Associate Prof. & Chairman, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization Research Center, Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran,

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization Research Center, Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to design a model of predictive factors of entrepreneurial opportunities in international companies. The research method is applicable in terms of purpose, and qualitative in terms of its implementation. The statistical population of the research includes 17 managers and experts active in the field of entrepreneurship, and the sampling was done in a purposeful and snowball manner, and the interviews continued until reaching theoretical saturation. The data collection tool is a semi-structured interview. Data-based method was used to collect and analyze data. Data analysis and pattern design were done in three stages of open, central, and selective coding. For data analysis, MAXQDA 18 software was used for coding. In the open coding stage, 305 preliminary codes were identified out of the analysis of the interviews. In the second stage; core coding based on research findings, the concept of entrepreneurial opportunities was chosen as the core phenomenon. Causal conditions were placed in the form of seven categories: unexpected events, changes based on industry and market structure, shortage based on methods, contradictory situation, change based on values and knowledge, new knowledge, and demographic characteristics; and the four main categories were selected include organizational strategies, market related strategies, business strategies, and effective performance management. Intervening factors were identified in two strengthening and weakening categories. Capital, corporate factors, social learning, gathering and studying information, individual characteristics, and social factors were determined as the background factors of entrepreneurial opportunities. Finally, the consequences of predictors of entrepreneurial opportunities were determined in two categories: financial and tangible, and non-financial and intangible.
Extended Abstract                                          
Introduction
According to entrepreneurship researchers, opportunity identification plays a very fundamental role in entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurship creates and recreates value for owners and beneficiaries, and opportunity is the heart of this process. Although opportunity recognition is considered the main characteristic of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial activity does not occur without it, not all people are able to recognize opportunities; thus not all people can achieve entrepreneurial activities (Jaber et al, 2022). Several studies have been conducted regarding the factors affecting opportunity identification to become the basis for increasing the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities. However, due to the importance of identifying opportunities in the entrepreneurial process, there is still a gap in studies in this field (Virasa et al, 2022). Identifying entrepreneurial opportunities is a relatively new issue that is known as an effective and sustainable solution for the economic and social development of countries, and attracts the attention of wider sections of society every day. The importance of identifying entrepreneurial opportunities is due to the fact that finding predictive factors are effective in identifying profitable opportunities that can be implemented in most parts of the world. Our country is also on the path of taking steps towards development and progress, and putting forward a comprehensive research on factors predicting entrepreneurial opportunities in Iran can help accelerate the process of progress. On the other hand, Iran is a country that has a long and fruitful history in the field of entrepreneurial activities, and attention to a new approach in this field leads to the actualization of the potential capabilities in this field (Abdi, 2015). Based on this, the current research is looking for an answer to this question: How is the design of the model of predictive factors of entrepreneurial opportunities in international companies?
Theoretical Framework
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship is a management attitude that gives meaning to concepts such as innovation, flexibility and accountability based on understanding environmental opportunities. Organizational entrepreneurship occurs when an organization relies on the growth and use of new opportunities of internal and external factors of its organization (Davali et al, 2022).
Entrepreneurial opportunities
An entrepreneurial opportunity includes a set of ideas, beliefs, and actions that make it possible for them to create future products and services in the absence of current markets. Identifying an entrepreneurial opportunity is the understanding of the possibility of creating a new business or specifically improving the existing situation of a business in such a way that leads to a new profitability potential. In other words, identifying an entrepreneurial opportunity is the ability to identify a good idea and turn that idea into a business concept that has value and economic returns (Scott & Scott, 2016).
Panahi et al, (2024) investigated the impact of entrepreneurial intention on students' entrepreneurial behavior regarding the moderating role of fear of failure and economic literacy. The results of the research showed that the variables of independence, innovation, and risk-taking of students have a positive and significant effect on entrepreneurial intention. Also, entrepreneurial intention has a positive and significant effect on entrepreneurial behavior. The fear of failure variable has a negative adjustment of the relationship between intention and behavior, and the economic literacy variable has a positive adjustment on this relationship. The research findings show the important role of personality traits on entrepreneurial intention and the importance of moderators introduced to fill the gap between entrepreneurial intention and behavior.
Fries & Jilnek (2023) investigated the psychology of entrepreneurship: action and process in a research. This study reviews entrepreneurial psychology research in the last decade; and focuses on two key themes in entrepreneurship research: action, and process. By combining action and process in a model of entrepreneurial psychology, the process model presents the theory of entrepreneurial action, which is used as a guiding framework for investigation. Theories of action are discussed, such as cause/effect, bricolage, theory of planned behavior, and action theory. In addition, they adopt a process perspective to discuss the antecedents of actions in terms of cognition, motivation, and emotions; and how they develop during the entrepreneurial process. The results of the research showed that the action theory process model is a useful starting point for explaining the psychological dynamics of entrepreneurship.
Research methodology
The research method is applicable in terms of purpose, and qualitative in terms of its implementation. The statistical population of the research includes 17 managers and experts active in the field of entrepreneurship, and the sampling was done in a purposeful and snowball manner, and the interviews continued until reaching theoretical saturation. The data collection tool is a semi-structured interview. Data-based method was used to collect and analyze data.
Research findings
Data analysis and pattern design were done in three stages of open, central, and selective coding. For data analysis, MAXQDA 18 software was used for coding. In the open coding stage, 305 preliminary codes were identified out of the analysis of the interviews. In the second stage; core coding based on research findings, the concept of entrepreneurial opportunities was chosen as the core phenomenon. Causal conditions were placed in the form of seven categories: unexpected events, changes based on industry and market structure, shortage based on methods, contradictory situation, change based on values and knowledge, new knowledge, and demographic characteristics; and the four main categories were selected include organizational strategies, market related strategies, business strategies, and effective performance management. Intervening factors were identified in two strengthening and weakening categories. Capital, corporate factors, social learning, gathering and studying information, individual characteristics, and social factors were determined as the background factors of entrepreneurial opportunities. Finally, the consequences of predictors of entrepreneurial opportunities were determined in two categories: financial and tangible, and non-financial and intangible.
Conclusion
The current research was conducted with the aim of designing a model of predictive factors of entrepreneurial opportunities in international companies. The results of this research are in agreement with the results of Panahi et al, (2024), Fries & Jilnek (2023), Abadeh et al, (2022), BurujAli (2022), Jaber et al, (2022), Doanh (2021), Bazkiaei et al, (2020), Hamzeh Ni Tehrani et al, (2022), Ghanizadeh et al, (2020), Zivodar (2019), Ahmadi et al, (2018), and Vaghely & Julien (2015).
Hamzeh Ni Tehrani et al, (2022) in their research confirmed the factors of personality characteristics and environmental factors as strengthening factors in discovering entrepreneurial opportunities. Effective strategies on the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities were also, by identifying sixty-five concepts, placed in the form of six sub-categories and four main categories of organizational strategies, market-related strategies, business strategies, and effective performance management.
According to the results of the research, the following suggestions are presented:
- continuous monitoring of changes and trends in society; these changes, which are influenced by social and economic factors and government policies, create new challenges and opportunities for companies that can make the best use of these opportunities with careful planning;
- Creating an open communication channel in the company environment; If there is no open communication in the workplace, people's creativity will be damaged. To bring innovation to the workplace, employees must be informed that the door is always open for discussion

Keywords

Subjects


Abadeh, M., & Pourkhosravani, M., & korhani, M. (2023). Investigating the relationship between talent management and organizational entrepreneurship with the mediating role of knowledge management in Sirjan municipalities. New Approaches in Management and Marketing, 2(1), 24-40. doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2023.383332.1002. (In Persian).
Abolhasani, h. (2011). Dissertation to receive a doctorate degree. Tehran, Payam Noor University, Faculty of Management.. (In Persian).
Ahmadi, S., & Akhavan Mahdavi, M., & Mokhtari, M. (2018). Identifying Entrepreneurial Opportunities in Social Sciences and Sociological Explanation of Factors Affecting the Exploitation of Opportunities in Iran. Journal of Applied Sociology, 29(3), 181-202. doi: 10.22108/jas.2018.107627.1219. (In Perasin)
Ahmadpour Dariani, M., Ebrahimi, S. (2017). One-minute Entrepreneurship: In Thousands of Entrepreneurial Thoughts. Tehran: Mehrab Galam. (In Persian)
Amiri, A. (2010). The role of school atmosphere and emotional intelligence in the entrepreneurial self-efficacy of female students in Mashhad vocational schools. Management and Educational Perspective,1(2). 15-36.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2020.227912.1010. (In Persian).
Ahmadpour, M., & S.M. Moghimi. (2016). Fundamentals of entrepreneurship. Tehran: Negahe Danesh (In Persian).
Abdi, J. (2015). Studying the determining factors of benefactors' tendency towards social entrepreneurship in charitable activities of Zahedan city. Master thesis, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Faculty of Management, Department of Entrepreneurship Management.. (In Perasin)
Ardichvili, A. & Cardozo, R. & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing 18, 105–123. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
Alvarez, S. A. & Barney, J. B. (2006). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11-26. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.900200
Baron, R. A. & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331-1344. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538
Baron, R. A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167-182. DOI:10.1002/sej.12
Baron, R. A. & Ozgen, E. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 174-192. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.12.001
Bazkiaei, H. A., & Heng, L. H., & Khan, N. U., & Saufi, R. B. A., & Kasim, R. S. R. (2020). Do entrepreneurial education and big-five personality traits predict entrepreneurial intention among universities students?. Cogent business & management, 7(1), 1801217. DOI:10.1080/23311975.2020.1801217
Buruj Ali, A. (2022). The mediating role of market orientation in the relationship between social skills and organizational entrepreneurship in Nab Steel Company. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 2(2), 34-50. doi: 10.22034/jbme.2022.360426.1036. (In Persian).
Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Totowa, N. J.: Barnes & Noble.
Casson, M. & Wadeson, N. (2017). The discovery of opportunities: Extending the economic theory of the entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 285-300. DOI:10.1007/s11187-006-9037-7
Castrogiovanni, G. J., & Urbano, D., & Loras, J. (2011). Linking corporate entrepreneurship and human resource management in SMEs. International Journal of Manpower, 32(1), 34-47
Davidsson, P. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Northampton Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship 22(2):206-209
Davali. M., & Razavi, R., & Masoom Zadeh Jozdani. R. (2022). The impact of information technology and innovation on performance with the mediation of organizational entrepreneurship (case study: Capital Bank). Industrial Technology Development Quarterly. Number 48. pp. 63-76 (in Persian)
Denrell, J., Fang, C. & Winter, S. G. (2003).The economics of strategic opportunity.Strategic Management Journal, 24, 977-990. DOI:10.1002/smj.341
Doanh, D. C. (2021). The role of contextual factors on predicting entrepreneurial intention among Vietnamese students. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(1), 169-188. DOI:10.15678/EBER.2021.090111
Frese, M., & Gielnik, M. M. (2023).The psychology of entrepreneurship: action and process. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 137-164. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055646
Foss, N.J., & Klein, P. G. (2010). Alertness, judgment, and the antecedents of entrepreneurship.Center for Strategic Management and Globalization Working paper, Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School.
Feridouni, b. (2021). The effect of international entrepreneurship orientation on the innovation of international businesses through the mediation of internationalization readiness in pharmaceutical companies, dissertation for receiving a doctorate degree. Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Management and Accounting.. (In Persian).
Goss, D. (2017). Reconsidering Schumpeterian opportunities: The contribution of interaction ritual chain theory. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 13(1), 3-18. & Research 13(1):3-18. DOI:10.1108/13552550710725156
Gaglio, C. (2004). The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(6), 533- 553. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00063.x
Gaglio, M. & Katz, J. A. (2011). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95-111. DOI:10.1023/A:1011132102464
Ghanizadeh, N., & Mobaraki, M.H., & Nilipour, R., & Mobini Dehkordi, A., & Yadalehi Farsi, J. (2019). Schematic model for identifying entrepreneurial opportunities. Organizational Behavior Studies, 9(4(36)), 221-247. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/408906/fa. (In Persian).
Hill, S. A. & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2010). Idea sets: Conceptualizing and measuring a new unit of analysis in entrepreneurship research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 85-113. DOI:10.1177/1094428109337542
Hamzeh Ni Tehrani, M., & Hachit Mofard, J., & Baskha, M. (2022). Designing a theme network for identifying entrepreneurial opportunities in the field of medical tourism. International Business Management, 5(1), 167-182. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/966069/fa. (In Persian).
Jabeur, S. B., Ballouk, H., Mefteh-Wali, S., & Omri, A. (2022). Forecasting the macrolevel determinants of entrepreneurial opportunities using artificial intelligence models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121353. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121353
Krueger, N.J. (2016). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(3), 91-104.
Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 145-152. DOI:10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7
Khosh Maram, M. (2015). Designing a model for identifying entrepreneurial opportunities among entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector of Kermanshah province, thesis for receiving a doctorate degree. Kermanshah, Razi University, Faculty of Agriculture. (In Persian).
Masoumi, E., & Rezaei Moghadam, K. (2021), Factors affecting the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities in the agricultural sector of Iran. Entrepreneurship strategies in agriculture biannual, volume: 8, number: 16, https://civilica.com/doc /1431221. (In Persian).
Mollah Mohammadi, M., & Mokhtari, N. (2017). The importance of entrepreneurship in today's organizations, the first scientific research conference on new achievements in management, accounting and economics studies in Iran, Ilam, https://civilica.com/doc/799861. (In Persian).
Panahi, A., & Habibirad, A., & Motie, H. (2024). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Intention on Entrepreneurial Behavior of Students Considering the Moderating Role of Fear of Failure and Economic Literacy. New Approaches in Management and Marketing, (), -. doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2024.443804.1049. (In Persian).
RAMEZANI, S., & REZVANFAR, A., & ALAMBEIGI, A.. (2021). Investigating Factors Affecting the Identification of Entrepreneurial Opportunities among the Herbal Plant Producers in North Khorasan Province. IRANIAN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND EDUCATION JOURNAL, 17(Special issue), 119-132. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1007961/en. (In Persian).
Scott, J. T., & Scott, T. J. (2016). The entrepreneur's idea and outside finance: Theory and evidence about entrepreneurial roles. European Economic Review, 86, 118-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.005.
Singh, R. P. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks.. Business & Economics - 195 pages
Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
Vaghely, I. P. & Julien, P. A. (2015). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 73–86. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.004
Virasa, T., Sukavejworakit, K., & Promsiri, T. (2022). Predicting entrepreneurial intention and economic development: A cross-national study of its policy implications for six ASEAN economies. Heliyon, 8(7). DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09435
Zolin, R. & Kropp, F. (2019). How environmental and organizational complexity affects opportunity recognition in development projects. CINet, 969-980.
Zivodar, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial opportunities: patterns and approaches, assumptions and perspectives. Policy of Science and Technology, 9(4 (29)), 47-55.. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/399997/en. (In Persian).
Ziyae, B., & Rezvani, M., & Dara, M. (2022). Identifying the Digital Internationalization Pattern of Small and Medium Businesses (Case Study: Pharmaceutical Industry Companies). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(4), 676-695. doi: 10.22059/jed.2021.322921.653652. (In Persian).
Volume 4, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11
Spring 2024
Pages 392-414

  • Receive Date 22 February 2024
  • Revise Date 19 April 2024
  • Accept Date 28 April 2024